lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:30:53 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	bobby.prani@...il.com, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/12] rcu: Panic if RCU tree can not accommodate all CPUs

From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>

Currently a condition when RCU tree is unable to accommodate
the configured number of CPUs is not permitted and causes
a fall back to compile-time values. However, the code has no
means to exceed the RCU tree capacity neither at compile-time
nor in run-time. Therefore, if the condition is met in run-
time then it indicates a serios problem elsewhere and should
be handled with a panic.

Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 1c58cbd03922..fe8d92987dfa 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4107,6 +4107,19 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
 		rcu_fanout_leaf, nr_cpu_ids);
 
 	/*
+	 * The boot-time rcu_fanout_leaf parameter is only permitted
+	 * to increase the leaf-level fanout, not decrease it.  Of course,
+	 * the leaf-level fanout cannot exceed the number of bits in
+	 * the rcu_node masks.  Complain and fall back to the compile-
+	 * time values if these limits are exceeded.
+	 */
+	if (rcu_fanout_leaf < RCU_FANOUT_LEAF ||
+	    rcu_fanout_leaf > sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) {
+		WARN_ON(1);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
 	 * Compute number of nodes that can be handled an rcu_node tree
 	 * with the given number of levels.  Setting rcu_capacity[0] makes
 	 * some of the arithmetic easier.
@@ -4117,19 +4130,11 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
 		rcu_capacity[i] = rcu_capacity[i - 1] * RCU_FANOUT;
 
 	/*
-	 * The boot-time rcu_fanout_leaf parameter is only permitted
-	 * to increase the leaf-level fanout, not decrease it.  Of course,
-	 * the leaf-level fanout cannot exceed the number of bits in
-	 * the rcu_node masks.  Finally, the tree must be able to accommodate
-	 * the configured number of CPUs.  Complain and fall back to the
-	 * compile-time values if these limits are exceeded.
+	 * The tree must be able to accommodate the configured number of CPUs.
+	 * If this limit is exceeded than we have a serious problem elsewhere.
 	 */
-	if (rcu_fanout_leaf < RCU_FANOUT_LEAF ||
-	    rcu_fanout_leaf > sizeof(unsigned long) * 8 ||
-	    n > rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS]) {
-		WARN_ON(1);
-		return;
-	}
+	if (n > rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS])
+		panic("rcu_init_geometry: rcu_capacity[] is too small");
 
 	/* Calculate the number of rcu_nodes at each level of the tree. */
 	for (i = 1; i <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; i++)
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ