linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: add a bi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:00:47 +1000
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add a bi_error field to struct bio

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:29:37 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:

> Currently we have two different ways to signal an I/O error on a BIO:
> 
>  (1) by clearing the BIO_UPTODATE flag
>  (2) by returning a Linux errno value to the bi_end_io callback
> 
> The first one has the drawback of only communicating a single possible
> error (-EIO), and the second one has the drawback of not beeing persistent
> when bios are queued up, and are not passed along from child to parent
> bio in the ever more popular chaining scenario.  Having both mechanisms
> available has the additional drawback of utterly confusing driver authors
> and introducing bugs where various I/O submitters only deal with one of
> them, and the others have to add boilerplate code to deal with both kinds
> of error returns.
> 
> So add a new bi_error field to store an errno value directly in struct
> bio and remove the existing mechanisms to clean all this up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---

Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> (umem and md/raid).

i.e. these files.
>  drivers/block/umem.c                |  4 +--
>  drivers/md/faulty.c                 |  4 +--
>  drivers/md/linear.c                 |  2 +-
>  drivers/md/md.c                     | 18 +++++------
>  drivers/md/multipath.c              | 12 +++----
>  drivers/md/raid0.c                  |  2 +-
>  drivers/md/raid1.c                  | 53 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  drivers/md/raid10.c                 | 55 +++++++++++++++-----------------
>  drivers/md/raid5.c                  | 52 +++++++++++++++----------------


Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/