linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and pcpu_reserved

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:52:37 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:	cl@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and
 pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice

Hello,

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 08:03:57AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Yes, dyn_size can't be zero. But in pcpu_setup_first_chunk(), the local
> variable dyn_size could be zero caused by below code:
> 
> if (ai->reserved_size) {
>                 schunk->free_size = ai->reserved_size;
>                 pcpu_reserved_chunk = schunk;
>                 pcpu_reserved_chunk_limit = ai->static_size +
> ai->reserved_size;
>         } else {
>                 schunk->free_size = dyn_size;
>                 dyn_size = 0;                   /* dynamic area covered
> */
>         }
> 
> So if no reserved_size dyn_size is assigned to zero, and is checked to
> see if dchunk need be created in below code:

Hmmm... but then pcpu_reserved_chunk is NULL so there still is no
duplicate on the list, no?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/