lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:55:16 +0900
From:	Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To:	Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
Cc:	openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] ipmi: Avoid touching possible corrupted lists in the
 panic context

When processing queued messages in the panic context, IPMI driver
tries to do it without any locking to avoid deadlocks.  However,
this means we can touch a corrupted list if the kernel panicked
while manipulating the list.  Fortunately, current `add-tail and
del-from-head' style implementation won't touch the corrupted part,
but it is inherently risky.

To get rid of the risk, this patch re-initializes the message lists
on panic if the related spinlock has already been acquired.  As the
result, we may lose queued messages, but it's not so painful.
Droping messages on the received message list is also less
problematic because no one can respond the received messages.

Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index f1ecd25..e7d84482 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -4507,6 +4507,23 @@ static int panic_event(struct notifier_block *this,
 			/* Interface is not ready. */
 			continue;
 
+		/*
+		 * If we were interrupted while locking xmit_msgs_lock or
+		 * waiting_rcv_msgs_lock, the corresponding list may be
+		 * corrupted.  In this case, drop itmes on the list for
+		 * the safety.
+		 */
+		if (!spin_trylock(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock)) {
+			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->xmit_msgs);
+			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->hp_xmit_msgs);
+		} else
+			spin_unlock(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock);
+
+		if (!spin_trylock(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock))
+			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs);
+		else
+			spin_unlock(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock);
+
 		intf->run_to_completion = 1;
 		intf->handlers->set_run_to_completion(intf->send_info, 1);
 	}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ