lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:33:35 +0800
From:	kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>
Cc:	kbuild-all@...org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [linux-next:master 2506/4558] fs/orangefs/pvfs2-sysfs.c:753:5:
 sparse: symbol 'sysfs_service_op_show' was not declared. Should it be
 static?

Hi Mike,

First bad commit (maybe != root cause):

tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head:   83a5f7f22cae24ea602152424bc9026fdc689ae9
commit: 2b651e05251d9f8149c998f6d2ca341ecb05a5aa [2506/4558] Orangefs: kernel client part 7
reproduce:
  # apt-get install sparse
  git checkout 2b651e05251d9f8149c998f6d2ca341ecb05a5aa
  make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
  make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> fs/orangefs/pvfs2-sysfs.c:753:5: sparse: symbol 'sysfs_service_op_show' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> fs/orangefs/pvfs2-sysfs.c:1026:5: sparse: symbol 'sysfs_service_op_store' was not declared. Should it be static?
--
>> fs/orangefs/pvfs2-mod.c:50:7: sparse: symbol 'DEBUG_LINE' was not declared. Should it be static?
--
>> fs/orangefs/super.c:272:25: sparse: symbol 'pvfs2_s_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> fs/orangefs/super.c:282:15: sparse: symbol 'pvfs2_fh_to_dentry' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> fs/orangefs/super.c:302:5: sparse: symbol 'pvfs2_encode_fh' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> fs/orangefs/super.c:350:5: sparse: symbol 'pvfs2_fill_sb' was not declared. Should it be static?
--
>> fs/orangefs/devpvfs2-req.c:867:13: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   fs/orangefs/devpvfs2-req.c:867:13:    expected void *__pu_val
   fs/orangefs/devpvfs2-req.c:867:13:    got void [noderef] <asn:1>*
--
>> fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:31:3: sparse: symbol '__pvfs2_bufmap' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:718:36: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:718:36:    expected void *from_kaddr
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:718:36:    got void [noderef] <asn:1>*iov_base
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:724:36: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:724:36:    expected void *from_kaddr
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:724:36:    got void [noderef] <asn:1>*iov_base
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:730:36: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:730:36:    expected void *from_kaddr
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:730:36:    got void [noderef] <asn:1>*iov_base
>> fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:940:34: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:940:34:    expected void *to_kaddr
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:940:34:    got void [noderef] <asn:1>*iov_base
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:946:34: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:946:34:    expected void *to_kaddr
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:946:34:    got void [noderef] <asn:1>*iov_base
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:952:34: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:952:34:    expected void *to_kaddr
   fs/orangefs/pvfs2-bufmap.c:952:34:    got void [noderef] <asn:1>*iov_base
--
>> fs/orangefs/pvfs2-debugfs.c:73:1: sparse: symbol 'orangefs_debug_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
--
>> fs/orangefs/waitqueue.c:256:6: sparse: context imbalance in 'pvfs2_clean_up_interrupted_operation' - different lock contexts for basic block

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ