| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:07:15 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Torvald Riegel <triegel@...hat.com>
CC: mtk.manpages@...il.com, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
bill o gallmeister <bgallmeister@...il.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
Subject: Next round: revised futex(2) man page for review
Hello all,
>From a draft sent out in March, I got a few useful comments that
I've now incorporated into this draft. And I got some complaints
from people who did not want to read groff source. My point
was that there are a bunch of FIXMEs in the page source that I
wanted people to look at... Anyway, this time, I will take
a different tack, interspersing the FIXMEs in a rendered
version of the page. I'd greatly appreciate help with those FIXMEs.
The current page source can be found at in a branch at
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git/log/?h=draft_futex
===
As becomes quickly obvious upon reading it, the current futex(2)
man page is in a sorry state, lacking many important details, and
also the various additions that have been made to the interface
over the last years. I've been working on revising it, first
of all based on input I got in response to a request for help
last year (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1703405),
especially taking Thomas Gleixner's input
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1703405/focus=2952)
into account. I also got some further offlist input from Darren
Hart, Torvald Riegel, and Davidlohr Bueso that has been
incorporated into the revised draft. Other than that, I got
some useful info out of Ulrich Drepper's paper (cited at the
end of the page) and one or two web pages (cited in the page
source).
The page has now increased in size by a factor of about 5, but
is far from complete. In particular, as I reworked the page,
there were many details that I was not 100% certain of, and I
have added FIXME markers to the page source. In addition,
Torvald added some text, and a few more FIXMEs. Some of
the FIXMEs are trivial, as in: I'd like confirmation that
I have correctly captured a technical detail. Others are more
substantial, probably requiring the addition of further text.
I appreciate that there are probably other things that can be
improved in the page. (Torvald and Darren have some ideas.)
However, before growing the page any further, I would like to
resolve as many of the FIXMEs (and any other problems that people
see) as possible in the existing text. I need help with that.
(And I know that dealing with that help, if I get it, will in
itself will be quite a task to deal with, which is why I have
been delaying it for many weeks now, as my time has been
rather limited recently.)
So, please take a look at the page below. At this point,
I would most especially appreciate help with the FIXMEs.
Cheers,
Michael
FUTEX(2) Linux Programmer's Manual FUTEX(2)
NAME
futex - fast user-space locking
SYNOPSIS
#include <linux/futex.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
int futex(int *uaddr, int futex_op, int val,
const struct timespec *timeout, /* or: uint32_t val2 */
int *uaddr2, int val3);
Note: There is no glibc wrapper for this system call; see NOTES.
DESCRIPTION
The futex() system call provides a method for waiting until a
certain condition becomes true. It is typically used as a block‐
ing construct in the context of shared-memory synchronization:
The program implements the majority of the synchronization in
user space, and uses one of the operations of the system call
when it is likely that it has to block for a longer time until
the condition becomes true. The program uses another operation
of the system call to wake anyone waiting for a particular condi‐
tion.
The condition is represented by the futex word, which is an
address in memory supplied to the futex() system call, and the
32-bit value at this memory location. (While the virtual
addresses for the same physical memory address in separate pro‐
cesses may be different, the same physical address may be shared
by the processes using mmap(2).)
When executing a futex operation that requests to block a thread,
the kernel will block only if the futex word has the value that
the calling thread supplied as expected value. The load from the
futex word, the comparison with the expected value, and the
actual blocking will happen atomically and totally ordered with
respect to concurrently executing futex operations on the same
futex word. Thus, the futex word is used to connect the synchro‐
nization in user space with the implementation of blocking by the
kernel; similar to an atomic compare-and-exchange operation that
potentially changes shared memory, blocking via a futex is an
atomic compare-and-block operation.
One example use of futexes is implementing locks. The state of
the lock (i.e., acquired or not acquired) can be represented as
an atomically accessed flag in shared memory. In the uncontended
case, a thread can access or modify the lock state with atomic
instructions, for example atomically changing it from not
acquired to acquired using an atomic compare-and-exchange
instruction. A thread maybe unable acquire a lock because it is
already acquired by another thread. It then may pass the lock's
flag as futex word and the value representing the acquired state
as the expected value to a futex() wait operation. The call to
futex() will block if and only if the lock is still acquired.
When releasing the lock, a thread has to first reset the lock
state to not acquired and then execute a futex operation that
wakes threads blocked on the lock flag used as futex word (this
can be be further optimized to avoid unnecessary wake-ups). See
futex(7) for more detail on how to use futexes.
Besides the basic wait and wake-up futex functionality, there are
further futex operations aimed at supporting more complex use
cases. Also note that no explicit initialization or destruction
are necessary to use futexes; the kernel maintains a futex (i.e.,
the kernel-internal implementation artifact) only while opera‐
tions such as FUTEX_WAIT, described below, are being performed on
a particular futex word.
Arguments
The uaddr argument points to the futex word. On all platforms,
futexes are four-byte integers that must be aligned on a four-
byte boundary. The operation to perform on the futex is speci‐
fied in the futex_op argument; val is a value whose meaning and
purpose depends on futex_op.
The remaining arguments (timeout, uaddr2, and val3) are required
only for certain of the futex operations described below. Where
one of these arguments is not required, it is ignored.
For several blocking operations, the timeout argument is a
pointer to a timespec structure that specifies a timeout for the
operation. However, notwithstanding the prototype shown above,
for some operations, the least significant four bytes are used as
an integer whose meaning is determined by the operation. For
these operations, the kernel casts the timeout value first to
unsigned long, then to uint32_t, and in the remainder of this
page, this argument is referred to as val2 when interpreted in
this fashion.
Where it is required, the uaddr2 argument is a pointer to a sec‐
ond futex word that is employed by the operation. The interpre‐
tation of the final integer argument, val3, depends on the opera‐
tion.
Futex operations
The futex_op argument consists of two parts: a command that spec‐
ifies the operation to be performed, bit-wise ORed with zero or
or more options that modify the behaviour of the operation. The
options that may be included in futex_op are as follows:
FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG (since Linux 2.6.22)
This option bit can be employed with all futex operations.
It tells the kernel that the futex is process-private and
not shared with another process (i.e., it is being used
for synchronization only between threads of the same
process). This allows the kernel to make some additional
performance optimizations.
As a convenience, <linux/futex.h> defines a set of con‐
stants with the suffix _PRIVATE that are equivalents of
all of the operations listed below, but with the
FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG ORed into the constant value. Thus,
there are FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, and so
on.
FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME (since Linux 2.6.28)
This option bit can be employed only with the
FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET and FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI operations.
If this option is set, the kernel treats timeout as an
absolute time based on CLOCK_REALTIME.
.\" FIXME XXX I added CLOCK_MONOTONIC below. Okay?
If this option is not set, the kernel treats timeout as
relative time, measured against the CLOCK_MONOTONIC clock.
The operation specified in futex_op is one of the following:
FUTEX_WAIT (since Linux 2.6.0)
This operation tests that the value at the futex word
pointed to by the address uaddr still contains the
expected value val, and if so, then sleeps awaiting
FUTEX_WAKE on the futex word. The load of the value of
the futex word is an atomic memory access (i.e., using
atomic machine instructions of the respective architec‐
ture). This load, the comparison with the expected value,
and starting to sleep are performed atomically and totally
ordered with respect to other futex operations on the same
futex word. If the thread starts to sleep, it is consid‐
ered a waiter on this futex word. If the futex value does
not match val, then the call fails immediately with the
error EAGAIN.
The purpose of the comparison with the expected value is
to prevent lost wake-ups: If another thread changed the
value of the futex word after the calling thread decided
to block based on the prior value, and if the other thread
executed a FUTEX_WAKE operation (or similar wake-up) after
the value change and before this FUTEX_WAIT operation,
then the latter will observe the value change and will not
start to sleep.
If the timeout argument is non-NULL, its contents specify
a relative timeout for the wait, measured according to the
.\" FIXME XXX I added CLOCK_MONOTONIC below. Okay?
CLOCK_MONOTONIC clock. (This interval will be rounded up
to the system clock granularity, and kernel scheduling
delays mean that the blocking interval may overrun by a
small amount.) If timeout is NULL, the call blocks indef‐
initely.
The arguments uaddr2 and val3 are ignored.
FUTEX_WAKE (since Linux 2.6.0)
This operation wakes at most val of the waiters that are
waiting (e.g., inside FUTEX_WAIT) on the futex word at the
address uaddr. Most commonly, val is specified as either
1 (wake up a single waiter) or INT_MAX (wake up all wait‐
ers). No guarantee is provided about which waiters are
awoken (e.g., a waiter with a higher scheduling priority
is not guaranteed to be awoken in preference to a waiter
with a lower priority).
The arguments timeout, uaddr2, and val3 are ignored.
FUTEX_FD (from Linux 2.6.0 up to and including Linux 2.6.25)
This operation creates a file descriptor that is associ‐
ated with the futex at uaddr. The caller must close the
returned file descriptor after use. When another process
or thread performs a FUTEX_WAKE on the futex word, the
file descriptor indicates as being readable with
select(2), poll(2), and epoll(7)
The file descriptor can be used to obtain asynchronous
notifications: if val is nonzero, then when another
process or thread executes a FUTEX_WAKE, the caller will
receive the signal number that was passed in val.
The arguments timeout, uaddr2 and val3 are ignored.
.\" FIXME(Torvald) We never define "upped". Maybe just remove the
.\" following sentence?
To prevent race conditions, the caller should test if the
futex has been upped after FUTEX_FD returns.
Because it was inherently racy, FUTEX_FD has been removed
from Linux 2.6.26 onward.
FUTEX_REQUEUE (since Linux 2.6.0)
.\" FIXME(Torvald) Is there some indication that FUTEX_REQUEUE is broken
.\" in general, or is this comment implicitly speaking about the
.\" condvar (?) use case? If the latter we might want to weaken the
.\" advice below a little.
.\" [Anyone else have input on this?]
Avoid using this operation. It is broken for its intended
purpose. Use FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE instead.
This operation performs the same task as
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE, except that no check is made using the
value in val3. (The argument val3 is ignored.)
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE (since Linux 2.6.7)
This operation first checks whether the location uaddr
still contains the value val3. If not, the operation
fails with the error EAGAIN. Otherwise, the operation
wakes up a maximum of val waiters that are waiting on the
futex at uaddr. If there are more than val waiters, then
the remaining waiters are removed from the wait queue of
the source futex at uaddr and added to the wait queue of
the target futex at uaddr2. The val2 argument specifies
an upper limit on the number of waiters that are requeued
to the futex at uaddr2.
.\" FIXME(Torvald) Is the following correct? Or is just the decision
.\" which threads to wake or requeue part of the atomic operation?
The load from uaddr is an atomic memory access (i.e.,
using atomic machine instructions of the respective archi‐
tecture). This load, the comparison with val3, and the
requeueing of any waiters are performed atomically and
totally ordered with respect to other operations on the
same futex word.
This operation was added as a replacement for the earlier
FUTEX_REQUEUE. The difference is that the check of the
value at uaddr can be used to ensure that requeueing hap‐
pens only under certain conditions. Both operations can
be used to avoid a "thundering herd" effect when
FUTEX_WAKE is used and all of the waiters that are woken
need to acquire another futex.
.\" FIXME Please review the following new paragraph to see if it is
.\" accurate.
Typical values to specify for val are 0 or or 1. (Speci‐
fying INT_MAX is not useful, because it would make the
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE operation equivalent to FUTEX_WAKE.)
The limit value specified via val2 is typically either 1
or INT_MAX. (Specifying the argument as 0 is not useful,
because it would make the FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE operation
equivalent to FUTEX_WAIT.)
.\" FIXME Here, it would be helpful to have an example of how
.\" FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE might be used, at the same time illustrating
.\" why FUTEX_WAKE is unsuitable for the same use case.
FUTEX_WAKE_OP (since Linux 2.6.14)
.\" FIXME I added a lengthy piece of text on FUTEX_WAKE_OP text,
.\" and I'd be happy if someone checked it.
.\"
.\" FIXME(Torvald) The glibc condvar implementation is currently being
.\" revised (e.g., to not use an internal lock anymore).
.\" It is probably more future-proof to remove this paragraph.
.\" [Torvald, do you have an update here?]
.\"
This operation was added to support some user-space use
cases where more than one futex must be handled at the
same time. The most notable example is the implementation
of pthread_cond_signal(3), which requires operations on
two futexes, the one used to implement the mutex and the
one used in the implementation of the wait queue associ‐
ated with the condition variable. FUTEX_WAKE_OP allows
such cases to be implemented without leading to high rates
of contention and context switching.
The FUTEX_WAIT_OP operation is equivalent to executing the
following code atomically and totally ordered with respect
to other futex operations on any of the two supplied futex
words:
int oldval = *(int *) uaddr2;
*(int *) uaddr2 = oldval op oparg;
futex(uaddr, FUTEX_WAKE, val, 0, 0, 0);
if (oldval cmp cmparg)
futex(uaddr2, FUTEX_WAKE, val2, 0, 0, 0);
In other words, FUTEX_WAIT_OP does the following:
* saves the original value of the futex word at uaddr2
and performs an operation to modify the value of the
futex at uaddr2; this is an atomic read-modify-write
memory access (i.e., using atomic machine instructions
of the respective architecture)
* wakes up a maximum of val waiters on the futex for the
futex word at uaddr; and
* dependent on the results of a test of the original
value of the futex word at uaddr2, wakes up a maximum
of val2 waiters on the futex for the futex word at
uaddr2.
The operation and comparison that are to be performed are
encoded in the bits of the argument val3. Pictorially,
the encoding is:
+---+---+-----------+-----------+
|op |cmp| oparg | cmparg |
+---+---+-----------+-----------+
4 4 12 12 <== # of bits
Expressed in code, the encoding is:
#define FUTEX_OP(op, oparg, cmp, cmparg) \
(((op & 0xf) << 28) | \
((cmp & 0xf) << 24) | \
((oparg & 0xfff) << 12) | \
(cmparg & 0xfff))
In the above, op and cmp are each one of the codes listed
below. The oparg and cmparg components are literal
numeric values, except as noted below.
The op component has one of the following values:
FUTEX_OP_SET 0 /* uaddr2 = oparg; */
FUTEX_OP_ADD 1 /* uaddr2 += oparg; */
FUTEX_OP_OR 2 /* uaddr2 |= oparg; */
FUTEX_OP_ANDN 3 /* uaddr2 &= ~oparg; */
FUTEX_OP_XOR 4 /* uaddr2 ^= oparg; */
In addition, bit-wise ORing the following value into op
causes (1 << oparg) to be used as the operand:
FUTEX_OP_ARG_SHIFT 8 /* Use (1 << oparg) as operand */
The cmp field is one of the following:
FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ 0 /* if (oldval == cmparg) wake */
FUTEX_OP_CMP_NE 1 /* if (oldval != cmparg) wake */
FUTEX_OP_CMP_LT 2 /* if (oldval < cmparg) wake */
FUTEX_OP_CMP_LE 3 /* if (oldval <= cmparg) wake */
FUTEX_OP_CMP_GT 4 /* if (oldval > cmparg) wake */
FUTEX_OP_CMP_GE 5 /* if (oldval >= cmparg) wake */
The return value of FUTEX_WAKE_OP is the sum of the number
of waiters woken on the futex uaddr plus the number of
waiters woken on the futex uaddr2.
FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET (since Linux 2.6.25)
This operation is like FUTEX_WAIT except that val3 is used
to provide a 32-bit bitset to the kernel. This bitset is
stored in the kernel-internal state of the waiter. See
the description of FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET for further details.
The FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET operation also interprets the time‐
out argument differently from FUTEX_WAIT. See the discus‐
sion of FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME, above.
The uaddr2 argument is ignored.
FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET (since Linux 2.6.25)
This operation is the same as FUTEX_WAKE except that the
val3 argument is used to provide a 32-bit bitset to the
kernel. This bitset is used to select which waiters
should be woken up. The selection is done by a bit-wise
AND of the "wake" bitset (i.e., the value in val3) and the
bitset which is stored in the kernel-internal state of the
waiter (the "wait" bitset that is set using
FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET). All of the waiters for which the
result of the AND is nonzero are woken up; the remaining
waiters are left sleeping.
.\" FIXME XXX Is this next paragraph that I added okay?
The effect of FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET and FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET is
to allow selective wake-ups among multiple waiters that
are blocked on the same futex. Note, however, that using
this bitset multiplexing feature on a futex is less effi‐
cient than simply using multiple futexes, because employ‐
ing bitset multiplexing requires the kernel to check all
waiters on a futex, including those that are not inter‐
ested in being woken up (i.e., they do not have the rele‐
vant bit set in their "wait" bitset).
The uaddr2 and timeout arguments are ignored.
The FUTEX_WAIT and FUTEX_WAKE operations correspond to
FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET and FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET operations where
the bitsets are all ones.
Priority-inheritance futexes
Linux supports priority-inheritance (PI) futexes in order to han‐
dle priority-inversion problems that can be encountered with nor‐
mal futex locks. Priority inversion is the problem that occurs
when a high-priority task is blocked waiting to acquire a lock
held by a low-priority task, while tasks at an intermediate pri‐
ority continuously preempt the low-priority task from the CPU.
Consequently, the low-priority task makes no progress toward
releasing the lock, and the high-priority task remains blocked.
Priority inheritance is a mechanism for dealing with the prior‐
ity-inversion problem. With this mechanism, when a high-priority
task becomes blocked by a lock held by a low-priority task, the
latter's priority is temporarily raised to that of the former, so
that it is not preempted by any intermediate level tasks, and can
thus make progress toward releasing the lock. To be effective,
priority inheritance must be transitive, meaning that if a high-
priority task blocks on a lock held by a lower-priority task that
is itself blocked by lock held by another intermediate-priority
task (and so on, for chains of arbitrary length), then both of
those task (or more generally, all of the tasks in a lock chain)
have their priorities raised to be the same as the high-priority
task.
.\" FIXME XXX The following is my attempt at a definition of PI futexes,
.\" based on mail discussions with Darren Hart. Does it seem okay?
From a user-space perspective, what makes a futex PI-aware is a
policy agreement between user space and the kernel about the
value of the futex word (described in a moment), coupled with the
use of the PI futex operations described below (in particular,
FUTEX_LOCK_PI, FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI, and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI).
.\" FIXME XXX ===== Start of adapted Hart/Guniguntala text =====
.\" The following text is drawn from the Hart/Guniguntala paper
.\" (listed in SEE ALSO), but I have reworded some pieces
.\" significantly. Please check it.
The PI futex operations described below differ from the other
futex operations in that they impose policy on the use of the
value of the futex word:
* If the lock is not acquired, the futex word's value shall be
0.
* If the lock is acquired, the futex word's value shall be the
thread ID (TID; see gettid(2)) of the owning thread.
* If the lock is owned and there are threads contending for the
lock, then the FUTEX_WAITERS bit shall be set in the futex
word's value; in other words, this value is:
FUTEX_WAITERS | TID
Note that a PI futex word never just has the value FUTEX_WAITERS,
which is a permissible state for non-PI futexes.
With this policy in place, a user-space application can acquire a
not-acquired lock or release a lock that no other threads try to
acquire using atomic instructions executed in user space (e.g., a
compare-and-swap operation such as cmpxchg on the x86 architec‐
ture). Acquiring a lock simply consists of using compare-and-
swap to atomically set the futex word's value to the caller's TID
if its previous value was 0. Releasing a lock requires using
compare-and-swap to set the futex word's value to 0 if the previ‐
ous value was the expected TID.
If a futex is already acquired (i.e., has a nonzero value), wait‐
ers must employ the FUTEX_LOCK_PI operation to acquire the lock.
If other threads are waiting for the lock, then the FUTEX_WAITERS
bit is set in the futex value; in this case, the lock owner must
employ the FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI operation to release the lock.
In the cases where callers are forced into the kernel (i.e.,
required to perform a futex() call), they then deal directly with
a so-called RT-mutex, a kernel locking mechanism which implements
the required priority-inheritance semantics. After the RT-mutex
is acquired, the futex value is updated accordingly, before the
calling thread returns to user space.
.\" FIXME ===== End of adapted Hart/Guniguntala text =====
.\" FIXME We need some explanation in the following paragraph of *why*
.\" it is important to note that "the kernel will update the
.\" futex word's value prior
It is important to note to returning to user space" . Can someone
explain? that the kernel will update the futex word's value
prior to returning to user space. Unlike the other futex opera‐
tions described above, the PI futex operations are designed for
the implementation of very specific IPC mechanisms.
.\"
.\" FIXME XXX In discussing errors for FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI, Darren Hart
.\" made the observation that "EINVAL is returned if the non-pi
.\" to pi or op pairing semantics are violated."
.\" Probably there needs to be a general statement about this
.\" requirement, probably located at about this point in the page.
.\" Darren (or someone else), care to take a shot at this?
.\"
.\" FIXME Somewhere on this page (I guess under the discussion of PI
.\" futexes) we need a discussion of the FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit.
.\" Can someone propose a text?
PI futexes are operated on by specifying one of the following
values in futex_op:
FUTEX_LOCK_PI (since Linux 2.6.18)
.\" FIXME I did some significant rewording of tglx's text to create
.\" the text below.
.\" Please check the following paragraph, in case I injected
.\" errors.
This operation is used after after an attempt to acquire
the lock via an atomic user-space instruction failed
because the futex word has a nonzero value—specifically,
because it contained the namespace-specific TID of the
lock owner.
.\" FIXME In the preceding line, what does "namespace-specific" mean?
.\" (I kept those words from tglx.)
.\" That is, what kind of namespace are we talking about?
.\" (I suppose we are talking PID namespaces here, but I want to
.\" be sure.)
The operation checks the value of the futex word at the
address uaddr. If the value is 0, then the kernel tries
to atomically set the futex value to the caller's TID.
.\" FIXME What would be the cause(s) of failure referred to
.\" in the following sentence?
If
that fails, or the futex word's value is nonzero, the ker‐
nel atomically sets the FUTEX_WAITERS bit, which signals
the futex owner that it cannot unlock the futex in user
space atomically by setting the futex value to 0. After
that, the kernel tries to find the thread which is associ‐
ated with the owner TID, creates or reuses kernel state on
behalf of the owner and attaches the waiter to it.
.\" FIXME Could I get a bit more detail on the previous lines?
.\" What is "creates or reuses kernel state" about?
.\" (I think this needs to be clearer in the page)
.\" FIXME In the next line, what type of "priority" are we talking about?
.\" Realtime priorities for SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR?
.\" Or something else?
The
enqueueing of the waiter is in descending priority order
if more than one waiter exists.
.\" FIXME In the next sentence, what type of "priority" are we talking about?
.\" Realtime priorities for SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR?
.\" Or something else?
.\" FIXME What does "bandwidth" refer to in the next sentence?
The owner inherits either
the priority or the bandwidth of the waiter.
.\" FIXME In the preceding sentence, what determines whether the
.\" owner inherits the priority versus the bandwidth?
.\" FIXME Could I get some help translating the next sentence into
.\" something that user-space developers (and I) can understand?
.\" In particular, what are "nested locks" in this context?
This inheri‐
tance follows the lock chain in the case of nested locking
and performs deadlock detection.
.\" FIXME tglx said "The timeout argument is handled as described in
.\" FUTEX_WAIT." However, it appears to me that this is not right.
.\" Is the following formulation correct?
The timeout argument provides a timeout for the lock
attempt. It is interpreted as an absolute time, measured
against the CLOCK_REALTIME clock. If timeout is NULL, the
operation will block indefinitely.
The uaddr2, val, and val3 arguments are ignored.
FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI (since Linux 2.6.18)
.\" FIXME I think it would be helpful here to say a few more words about
.\" the difference(s) between FUTEX_LOCK_PI and FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI.
.\" Can someone propose something?
This operation tries to acquire the futex at uaddr. It
deals with the situation where the TID value at uaddr is
0, but the FUTEX_WAITERS bit is set. User space cannot
handle this condition in a race-free manner
.\" FIXME How does the situation in the previous sentence come about?
.\" Probably it would be helpful to say something about that in
.\" the man page.
.\" FIXME And *how* does FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI deal with this situation?
The uaddr2, val, timeout, and val3 arguments are ignored.
FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI (since Linux 2.6.18)
This operation wakes the top priority waiter that is wait‐
ing in FUTEX_LOCK_PI on the futex address provided by the
uaddr argument.
This is called when the user space value at uaddr cannot
be changed atomically from a TID (of the owner) to 0.
The uaddr2, val, timeout, and val3 arguments are ignored.
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI (since Linux 2.6.31)
This operation is a PI-aware variant of FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE.
It requeues waiters that are blocked via
FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI on uaddr from a non-PI source futex
(uaddr) to a PI target futex (uaddr2).
As with FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE, this operation wakes up a maxi‐
mum of val waiters that are waiting on the futex at uaddr.
However, for FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI, val is required to be 1
(since the main point is to avoid a thundering herd). The
remaining waiters are removed from the wait queue of the
source futex at uaddr and added to the wait queue of the
target futex at uaddr2.
The val2 and val3 arguments serve the same purposes as for
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE.
.\" FIXME The page at http://locklessinc.com/articles/futex_cheat_sheet/
.\" notes that "priority-inheritance Futex to priority-inheritance
.\" Futex requeues are currently unsupported". Do we need to say
.\" something in the man page about that?
FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI (since Linux 2.6.31)
.\" FIXME I find the next sentence (from tglx) pretty hard to grok.
.\" Could someone explain it a bit more?
Wait operation to wait on a non-PI futex at uaddr and
potentially be requeued onto a PI futex at uaddr2. The
wait operation on uaddr is the same as FUTEX_WAIT.
.\" FIXME I'm not quite clear on the meaning of the following sentence.
.\" Is this trying to say that while blocked in a
.\" FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI, it could happen that another
.\" task does a FUTEX_WAKE on uaddr that simply causes
.\" a normal wake, with the result that the FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI
.\" does not complete? What happens then to the FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI
.\" opertion? Does it remain blocked, or does it unblock
.\" In which case, what does user space see?
The
waiter can be removed from the wait on uaddr via
FUTEX_WAKE without requeueing on uaddr2.
.\" FIXME Please check the following. tglx said "The timeout argument
.\" is handled as described in FUTEX_WAIT.", but the truth is
.\" as below, AFAICS
If timeout is not NULL, it specifies a timeout for the
wait operation; this timeout is interpreted as outlined
above in the description of the FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME
option. If timeout is NULL, the operation can block
indefinitely.
The val3 argument is ignored.
.\" FIXME Re the preceding sentence... Actually 'val3' is internally set to
.\" FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY before calling futex_wait_requeue_pi().
.\" I'm not sure we need to say anything about this though.
.\" Comments?
The FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI were
added to support a fairly specific use case: support for
priority-inheritance-aware POSIX threads condition vari‐
ables. The idea is that these operations should always be
paired, in order to ensure that user space and the kernel
remain in sync. Thus, in the FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI opera‐
tion, the user-space application pre-specifies the target
of the requeue that takes place in the
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI operation.
RETURN VALUE
In the event of an error (and assuming that futex() was invoked
via syscall(2)), all operations return -1 and set errno to indi‐
cate the cause of the error. The return value on success depends
on the operation, as described in the following list:
FUTEX_WAIT
Returns 0 if the caller was woken up. Note that a wake-up
can also be caused by common futex usage patterns in unre‐
lated code that happened to have previously used the futex
word's memory location (e.g., typical futex-based imple‐
mentations of Pthreads mutexes can cause this under some
conditions). Therefore, callers should always conserva‐
tively assume that a return value of 0 can mean a spurious
wake-up, and use the futex word's value (i.e., the user
space synchronization scheme)
to decide whether to continue to block or not.
FUTEX_WAKE
Returns the number of waiters that were woken up.
FUTEX_FD
Returns the new file descriptor associated with the futex.
FUTEX_REQUEUE
Returns the number of waiters that were woken up.
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE
Returns the total number of waiters that were woken up or
requeued to the futex for the futex word at uaddr2. If
this value is greater than val, then difference is the
number of waiters requeued to the futex for the futex word
at uaddr2.
FUTEX_WAKE_OP
Returns the total number of waiters that were woken up.
This is the sum of the woken waiters on the two futexes
for the futex words at uaddr and uaddr2.
FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET
Returns 0 if the caller was woken up. See FUTEX_WAIT for
how to interpret this correctly in practice.
FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET
Returns the number of waiters that were woken up.
FUTEX_LOCK_PI
Returns 0 if the futex was successfully locked.
FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI
Returns 0 if the futex was successfully locked.
FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI
Returns 0 if the futex was successfully unlocked.
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI
Returns the total number of waiters that were woken up or
requeued to the futex for the futex word at uaddr2. If
this value is greater than val, then difference is the
number of waiters requeued to the futex for the futex word
at uaddr2.
FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI
Returns 0 if the caller was successfully requeued to the
futex for the futex word at uaddr2.
ERRORS
EACCES No read access to the memory of a futex word.
EAGAIN (FUTEX_WAIT, FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET, FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI) The
value pointed to by uaddr was not equal to the expected
value val at the time of the call.
Note: on Linux, the symbolic names EAGAIN and EWOULDBLOCK
(both of which appear in different parts of the kernel
futex code) have the same value.
EAGAIN (FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI) The value
pointed to by uaddr is not equal to the expected value
val3. (This probably indicates a race; use the safe
FUTEX_WAKE now.)
.\" FIXME: Is the preceding sentence "(This probably...") correct?
.\" [I would prefer to remove this sentence. --triegel@...hat.com]
EAGAIN (FUTEX_LOCK_PI, FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI)
The futex owner thread ID of uaddr (for
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI: uaddr2) is about to exit, but has
not yet handled the internal state cleanup. Try again.
.\" FIXME XXX Should there be an EAGAIN case for FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI?
.\" It seems so, looking at the handling of the rt_mutex_trylock()
.\" call in futex_lock_pi()
.\" (Davidlohr also thinks so.)
EDEADLK
(FUTEX_LOCK_PI, FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI)
The futex word at uaddr is already locked by the caller.
EDEADLK
.\" FIXME I reworded tglx's text somewhat; is the following okay?
(FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI) While requeueing a waiter to the PI
futex for the futex word at uaddr2, the kernel detected a
deadlock.
.\" FIXME XXX I see that kernel/locking/rtmutex.c uses EDEADLK in some
.\" places, and EDEADLOCK in others. On almost all architectures
.\" these constants are synonymous. Is there a reason that both
.\" names are used?
EFAULT A required pointer argument (i.e., uaddr, uaddr2, or time‐
out) did not point to a valid user-space address.
EINTR A FUTEX_WAIT or FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET operation was inter‐
rupted by a signal (see signal(7)). In kernels before
Linux 2.6.22, this error could also be returned for on a
spurious wakeup; since Linux 2.6.22, this no longer hap‐
pens.
EINVAL The operation in futex_op is one of those that employs a
timeout, but the supplied timeout argument was invalid
(tv_sec was less than zero, or tv_nsec was not less than
1,000,000,000).
EINVAL The operation specified in futex_op employs one or both of
the pointers uaddr and uaddr2, but one of these does not
point to a valid object—that is, the address is not four-
byte-aligned.
EINVAL (FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET, FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET) The bitset supplied
in val3 is zero.
EINVAL (FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI) uaddr equals uaddr2 (i.e., an
attempt was made to requeue to the same futex).
EINVAL (FUTEX_FD) The signal number supplied in val is invalid.
EINVAL (FUTEX_WAKE, FUTEX_WAKE_OP, FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET,
FUTEX_REQUEUE, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE) The kernel detected an
inconsistency between the user-space state at uaddr and
the kernel state—that is, it detected a waiter which waits
in FUTEX_LOCK_PI on uaddr.
EINVAL (FUTEX_LOCK_PI, FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI, FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI) The
kernel detected an inconsistency between the user-space
state at uaddr and the kernel state. This indicates
either state corruption or that the kernel found a waiter
on uaddr which is waiting via FUTEX_WAIT or
FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET.
.\" FIXME Above, tglx did not mention the "state corruption" case for
.\" FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI, but I have added it, since I'm estimating
.\" that it also applied for FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI.
.\" So, does that case also apply for FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI?
EINVAL (FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI) The kernel detected an inconsis‐
tency between the user-space state at uaddr2 and the ker‐
nel state; that is, the kernel detected a waiter which
waits via FUTEX_WAIT on uaddr2.
.\" FIXME In the preceding sentence, tglx did not mention FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET,
.\" but should that not also be included here?
EINVAL (FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI) The kernel detected an inconsis‐
tency between the user-space state at uaddr and the kernel
state; that is, the kernel detected a waiter which waits
via FUTEX_WAIT or FUTEX_WAIT_BITESET on uaddr.
EINVAL (FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI) The kernel detected an inconsis‐
tency between the user-space state at uaddr and the kernel
state; that is, the kernel detected a waiter which waits
on uaddr via FUTEX_LOCK_PI (instead of
FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI).
.\" FIXME XXX The following is a reworded version of Darren Hart's text.
.\" Please check that I did not introduce any errors.
EINVAL (FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI) An attempt was made to requeue a
waiter to a futex other than that specified by the match‐
ing FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI call for that waiter.
EINVAL (FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI) The val argument is not 1.
EINVAL Invalid argument.
ENOMEM (FUTEX_LOCK_PI, FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI)
The kernel could not allocate memory to hold state infor‐
mation.
ENFILE (FUTEX_FD) The system limit on the total number of open
files has been reached.
ENOSYS Invalid operation specified in futex_op.
ENOSYS The FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME option was specified in futex_op,
but the accompanying operation was neither FUTEX_WAIT_BIT‐
SET nor FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI.
ENOSYS (FUTEX_LOCK_PI, FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI, FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI,
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI, FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI) A run-time
check determined that the operation is not available. The
PI futex operations are not implemented on all architec‐
tures and are not supported on some CPU variants.
EPERM (FUTEX_LOCK_PI, FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI)
The caller is not allowed to attach itself to the futex at
uaddr (for FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI: the futex at uaddr2).
(This may be caused by a state corruption in user space.)
EPERM (FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI) The caller does not own the lock repre‐
sented by the futex word.
ESRCH (FUTEX_LOCK_PI, FUTEX_TRYLOCK_PI, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI)
.\" FIXME I reworded the following sentence a bit differently from
.\" tglx's formulation. Is it okay?
The thread ID in the futex word at uaddr does not exist.
ESRCH (FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI)
.\" FIXME I reworded the following sentence a bit differently from
.\" tglx's formulation. Is it okay?
The thread ID in the futex word at
uaddr2 does not exist.
ETIMEDOUT
The operation in futex_op employed the timeout specified
in timeout, and the timeout expired before the operation
completed.
VERSIONS
Futexes were first made available in a stable kernel release with
Linux 2.6.0.
Initial futex support was merged in Linux 2.5.7 but with differ‐
ent semantics from what was described above. A four-argument
system call with the semantics described in this page was intro‐
duced in Linux 2.5.40. In Linux 2.5.70, one argument was added.
In Linux 2.6.7, a sixth argument was added—messy, especially on
the s390 architecture.
CONFORMING TO
This system call is Linux-specific.
NOTES
Glibc does not provide a wrapper for this system call; call it
using syscall(2).
Various higher-level programming abstractions are implemented via
futexes, including POSIX threads mutexes and condition variables,
as well as POSIX semaphores.
EXAMPLE
.\" FIXME Is it worth having an example program?
.\" FIXME Anything obviously broken in the example program?
The program below demonstrates use of futexes in a program where
parent and child use a pair of futexes located inside a shared
anonymous mapping to synchronize access to a shared resource: the
terminal. The two processes each write nloops (a command-line
argument that defaults to 5 if omitted) messages to the terminal
and employ a synchronization protocol that ensures that they
alternate in writing messages. Upon running this program we see
output such as the following:
$ ./futex_demo
Parent (18534) 0
Child (18535) 0
Parent (18534) 1
Child (18535) 1
Parent (18534) 2
Child (18535) 2
Parent (18534) 3
Child (18535) 3
Parent (18534) 4
Child (18535) 4
Program source
/* futex_demo.c
Usage: futex_demo [nloops]
(Default: 5)
Demonstrate the use of futexes in a program where parent and child
use a pair of futexes located inside a shared anonymous mapping to
synchronize access to a shared resource: the terminal. The two
processes each write 'num-loops' messages to the terminal and employ
a synchronization protocol that ensures that they alternate in
writing messages.
*/
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <linux/futex.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#define errExit(msg) do { perror(msg); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); \
} while (0)
static int *futex1, *futex2, *iaddr;
static int
futex(int *uaddr, int futex_op, int val,
const struct timespec *timeout, int *uaddr2, int val3)
{
return syscall(SYS_futex, uaddr, futex_op, val,
timeout, uaddr, val3);
}
/* Acquire the futex pointed to by 'futexp': wait for its value to
become 1, and then set the value to 0. */
static void
fwait(int *futexp)
{
int s;
/* __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(ptr, oldval, newval) is a gcc
built-in function. It atomically performs the equivalent of:
if (*ptr == oldval)
*ptr = newval;
It returns true if the test yielded true and *ptr was updated.
The alternative here would be to employ the equivalent atomic
machine-language instructions. For further information, see
the GCC Manual. */
while (1) {
/* Is the futex available? */
if (__sync_bool_compare_and_swap(futexp, 1, 0))
break; /* Yes */
/* Futex is not available; wait */
s = futex(futexp, FUTEX_WAIT, 0, NULL, NULL, 0);
if (s == -1 && errno != EAGAIN)
errExit("futex-FUTEX_WAIT");
}
}
/* Release the futex pointed to by 'futexp': if the futex currently
has the value 0, set its value to 1 and the wake any futex waiters,
so that if the peer is blocked in fpost(), it can proceed. */
static void
fpost(int *futexp)
{
int s;
/* __sync_bool_compare_and_swap() was described in comments above */
if (__sync_bool_compare_and_swap(futexp, 0, 1)) {
s = futex(futexp, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, NULL, NULL, 0);
if (s == -1)
errExit("futex-FUTEX_WAKE");
}
}
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
pid_t childPid;
int j, nloops;
setbuf(stdout, NULL);
nloops = (argc > 1) ? atoi(argv[1]) : 5;
/* Create a shared anonymous mapping that will hold the futexes.
Since the futexes are being shared between processes, we
subsequently use the "shared" futex operations (i.e., not the
ones suffixed "_PRIVATE") */
iaddr = mmap(NULL, sizeof(int) * 2, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED, -1, 0);
if (iaddr == MAP_FAILED)
errExit("mmap");
futex1 = &iaddr[0];
futex2 = &iaddr[1];
*futex1 = 0; /* State: unavailable */
*futex2 = 1; /* State: available */
/* Create a child process that inherits the shared anonymous
mapping */
childPid = fork();
if (childPid == -1)
errExit("fork");
if (childPid == 0) { /* Child */
for (j = 0; j < nloops; j++) {
fwait(futex1);
printf("Child (%ld) %d\n", (long) getpid(), j);
fpost(futex2);
}
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
/* Parent falls through to here */
for (j = 0; j < nloops; j++) {
fwait(futex2);
printf("Parent (%ld) %d\n", (long) getpid(), j);
fpost(futex1);
}
wait(NULL);
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
SEE ALSO
get_robust_list(2), restart_syscall(2), futex(7)
The following kernel source files:
* Documentation/pi-futex.txt
* Documentation/futex-requeue-pi.txt
* Documentation/locking/rt-mutex.txt
* Documentation/locking/rt-mutex-design.txt
* Documentation/robust-futex-ABI.txt
Franke, H., Russell, R., and Kirwood, M., 2002. Fuss, Futexes
and Furwocks: Fast Userlevel Locking in Linux (from proceedings
of the Ottawa Linux Symposium 2002),
⟨http://kernel.org/doc/ols/2002/ols2002-pages-479-495.pdf⟩
Hart, D., 2009. A futex overview and update,
⟨http://lwn.net/Articles/360699/⟩
Hart, D. and Guniguntala, D., 2009. Requeue-PI: Making Glibc
Condvars PI-Aware (from proceedings of the 2009 Real-Time Linux
Workshop),
⟨http://lwn.net/images/conf/rtlws11/papers/proc/p10.pdf⟩
Drepper, U., 2011. Futexes Are Tricky,
⟨http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/futex.pdf⟩
Futex example library, futex-*.tar.bz2 at
⟨ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/⟩
.\" FIXME Are there any other resources that should be listed
.\" in the SEE ALSO section?
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists