[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150730084927.GC4055@odux.rfo.atmel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:49:27 +0200
From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
To: Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@...secur.com>
CC: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
<davidcdueck@...glemail.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] pinctrl: at91: fix null pointer dereference
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:33:43AM +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> Hello Ludovic,
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:12:53PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Ludovic Desroches
[...]
> > > Is this a regression to v4.2 that should go to stable or v4.3 material?
> >
> > Yes it is a regression from v4.0, it applies well on v4.0.9
> >
> > Fixes: a0b957f306fa ("pinctrl: at91: allow to have disabled gpio bank")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.0
>
> a0b957f306fa have a stable tag up to 3.18, should this patch inherit a
> stable tag up to 3.18 instead of only up to 4.0 ?
>
Well spotted, I didn't notice it has hit 3.18 through stable, so yes
stable tag should be 3.18 and later.
Thanks
Ludovic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists