linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/164] 3.2.70-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 02 Aug 2015 22:49:54 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Phil Jensen <pjensen@...rnote.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/164] 3.2.70-rc1 review

On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 19:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/01/2015 05:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.70 release.
> > There are 164 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed Aug 05 23:00:00 UTC 2015.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	> total: 96 pass: 96 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	> total: 22 pass: 22 fail: 0
> 
> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.

Thanks.  I was checking there as I went along, which is why I added
patches 158-160.  (It looks like you turned on some new config options
for those architectures recently, as the bugs those fix don't seem to
be triggered by earlier patches.)

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)