linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/7] x86/lguest: Do not setup unused irq vectors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:57:07 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/7] x86/lguest: Do not setup unused irq vectors

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
>> > +
>> > +	/* Some systems map "vectors" to interrupts weirdly.  Not us! */
>> > +	__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + irq, irq);
>> 
>> Missing ].
>
> Doh.
>
>> [   17.751889] do_IRQ: 0.33 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
>> 
>> You broke interrupts :(
>
> Right, because I missed the other place which fiddles with
> interrupts. Does the patch below fix the issue?

Yep.  I added error handling.

I reworked it into two patches: one which staticizes lguest_setup_irq()
and moves it up, the other of which applies your changes.

Will post, you can take them...

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/