lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:11:23 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc:	pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>, He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Xia Kaixu <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf eBPF patch ordering.  was: Re: perf test LLVM was: Re: [GIT
 PULL 00/39] perf tools: filtering events using eBPF programs

Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:55:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:39:39PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:

> >   https://github.com/WangNan0/linux.git ebpf
 
> Ok, but I am checking patch by patch to see if the changes I made are
> kept, and for the first one, it wasn't (the second one is the cset in

ouch, you now use a branch named "ebpf" whereas before you used
"perf/ebpf-for-acme" before, that was what I was looking at now :-\

After I realised that, yes, you kept my changes in the "ebpf" branch,
looking there now.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ