linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: fix sparse warning for lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:34:55 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Peng Fan <van.freenix@...il.com>
Cc:	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: fix sparse warning for lock

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:26:44PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Use __acquire() and __release() in the right place to silence the sparse
> lock checking warning.
> 
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:177:13: warning: context imbalance in 'lynxfb_ops_fillrect' - different lock contexts for basic block
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:243:9: warning: context imbalance in 'lynxfb_ops_copyarea' - different lock contexts for basic block
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:247:13: warning: context imbalance in 'lynxfb_ops_imageblit' - different lock contexts for basic block
> 

Sparse is really bad at locking stuff.  Smatch is also really bad for
locking and I have been promising to re-write that check for years, but
I take comfort always in the fact that at least it's not as bad as
Sparse.

You should pretty much ignore Sparse locking warnings.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/