linux-kernel - [RFC v0 0/3] Simple wait queue support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed,  5 Aug 2015 15:30:45 +0200
From:	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
To:	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	bigeasy@...utronix.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Subject: [RFC v0 0/3] Simple wait queue support

Hi,

It's a while since the last attempt by Paul to get simple wait ready
for mainline [1]. At the last realtime workshop it was discussed how
the swait implementation could be made preempt aware. Peter posted an
untested version of it here [2].

In order to test it, I used Paul's two patches which makes completion
and rcu using swait instead of wait. Some small renamings were
necessary to get it working, e.g. s/swait_head/swait_queue_head/.

My test system didn't crash or showed any obvious defects, so I
decided to apply some benchmarks utilizing mmtests. I have picked some
random tests (kernbench aim9 vmr-stream ebizz), which didn't require a
lot of tinker around to get them running. The results are here:

  baseline: v4.2-rc5-22-ged8bbba

  http://monom.org/mmtests-swait-peterz-v1/

I don't think the numbers are trustworthy yet. Mabye one could read
it as it doesn't explode and the numbers aren't to far away from
baseline. I need to figure out which tests are fitting for these
patches and what are the 'right' parameters for them.

Sebastian had some comments on Peter's patch. I haven't addressed them
yet [3].

cheers,
daniel

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/616857/
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg12703.html
[3] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg832142.html

Paul Gortmaker (2):
  sched/completion: convert completions to use simple wait queues
  rcu: use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree

Peter Zijlstra (1):
  KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq

 include/linux/completion.h |   8 +--
 include/linux/swait.h      | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/rcu/tree.c          |  13 ++--
 kernel/rcu/tree.h          |   6 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h   |  18 ++---
 kernel/sched/Makefile      |   2 +-
 kernel/sched/completion.c  |  32 ++++-----
 kernel/sched/swait.c       | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 334 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/swait.h
 create mode 100644 kernel/sched/swait.c

-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/