lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:23:21 +0800
From:	Henry Chen <HenryC.Chen@...iatek.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: Implement wake handler and suspend/resume
 for mt6397-core.c

Hi Jones,

On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 12:42 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> No need to mention the filename in the subject line.  You already
> mentioned which driver is effected by the change.
Ok, it will be changed.

> 
> > Register mt6393_irq as wake up source to pinctrl by flag "IRQF_NO_SUSPEND".
> > Implement .irq_set_wake() function of pmic to keep who is wakeup source,
> > and enable irq on .suspend()and restore irq on .resume().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c       | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  include/linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > index 03929a6..aebdee5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -142,6 +161,7 @@ static int mt6397_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> >  	irq_set_chip_data(irq, mt6397);
> >  	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &mt6397_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
> >  	irq_set_nested_thread(irq, 1);
> > +
> 
> Remainder of the patch looks okay, but this irrelevant change, which
> has nothing to do with the remainder of the patch will cause issues if
> I attempt to apply it.  Please remove and re-submit.
> 
Sorry, I will remove it, thanks.
Henry

> [...]
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ