| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:45:30 -0400 From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com> To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sgrubb@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com, peter@...3.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V10] fixup! audit: add audit by children of executable path On Monday, August 10, 2015 12:53:54 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/08/10, Paul Moore wrote: > > I'm still not convinced that we need to merge exe child filtering patch so > > I'm not going to apply this, or your v10 patch, at this point in time. > > If you want to hold on to the code in case you and/or Steve think you can > > convince me at a later date, you might as well merge this fixup patch > > into the v10 patch. > > I fixed the known problems and reposted it for reference and public > archive so that it wasn't buried privately in my tree. No problem, that's smart. I just wanted to respond so that there wasn't any confusion about the status of this patch; I figure everybody who takes the time to post a patch deserves a response, even if it is "no thanks". > Aside from the need for the child filtering patch, do the RCU treatments > here look reasonable? Yep, it looks reasonable to me. -- paul moore security @ redhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists