linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/110] 3.2.71-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:21:03 -0400
From:	Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Phil Jensen <pjensen@...rnote.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/110] 3.2.71-rc1 review

On 08/10/2015 06:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.71 release.
> There are 110 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Aug 12 11:00:00 UTC 2015.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> A combined patch relative to 3.2.70 will be posted as an additional
> response to this.  A shortlog and diffstat can be found below.
>

Was thinking I would see upstream commit 
b6878d9e03043695dbf3fa1caa6dfc09db225b16, overlooked?

Has been backported by at least Debian in their 3.2 kernel, version 
3.2.68-1+deb7u3, to fix CVE-2015-5697.

Maybe this upstream commit is too new and so it will show up in a later 
3.2 stable version?

Thanks,
-Jon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/