lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:38:28 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	dvlasenk@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, brgerst@...il.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
	keescook@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de, oleg@...hat.com,
	luto@...nel.org, luto@...capital.net,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/64: Migrate error and IRQ exit work
 to C and remove old assembly code

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:53:29AM -0700, tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Commit-ID:  02bc7768fe447ae305e924b931fa629073a4a1b9
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/02bc7768fe447ae305e924b931fa629073a4a1b9
> Author:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> AuthorDate: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:44:31 -0700
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 10:59:08 +0200
> 
> x86/asm/entry/64: Migrate error and IRQ exit work to C and remove old assembly code
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/60e90901eee611e59e958bfdbbe39969b4f88fe5.1435952415.git.luto@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S        | 64 +++++++++++-----------------------------
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S |  5 ++++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> index 83eb63d..168ee26 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -1088,7 +1055,12 @@ ENTRY(error_entry)
>  	SWAPGS
>  
>  .Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> +	call enter_from_user_mode
> +#endif

This makes me very nervous as well!

It means that instead of using the context tracking save/restore model that we had
with exception_enter/exception_exit(), now we rely on the CS register.

I don't think we can do that because our "context tracking" is a soft tracking whereas
CS is hard tracking and both are not atomically synchronized together.

Imagine this situation: we are running in userspace. Context tracking knows it, everything
is fine. Now we do a syscall, we enter in kernel entry code but we trigger an exception
(DEBUG for example) before we got a chance to call user_exit(), which means that the context
tracking code still thinks we are in userspace, so we look at CS from the exception entry code
and it says the exception happened in the kernel. Hence we don't call user_exit() before calling
the exception handler. There is the bug because the exception handler may use RCU which still
thinks we run in userspace.

In early context tracking days we have relied on CS. But I changed that because of such
issue. The only reliable source for soft context tracking is the soft context tracking itself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ