linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86, gfp: Cache best near node for memory allocation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:53:51 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	hpa@...or.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, yasu.isimatu@...il.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, gongzhaogang@...pur.com,
	qiaonuohan@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86, gfp: Cache best near node for memory allocation.

On 2015/8/9 14:15, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Liu,
> 
> Have you posted your new patches ?
> (I mean memory-less node support patches.)
Hi Chen,
	I have rebased my patches to v4.2-rc4, but unfortunately
it breaks. Seems there are some changes in x86 NUMA support since
3.17. I need some time to figure it out.

> 
> If you are going to post them, please cc me.
Sure.

> 
> And BTW, how did you reproduce the memory-less node problem ?
> Do you have a real memory-less node on your machine ?
Yes, we have a system with memoryless nodes.
Thanks!
Gerry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/