linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:51:54 -0600
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
	Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs

On 08/12/2015 01:07 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Neil/Mike/Martin have acked/reviewed PATCH 1.
> Now it's ready. Could you please apply this series?
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mlin/linux.git/log/?h=block-generic-req
>
> Please note that, for discard, we cap the size at 2G.
> We'll change it to UINT_MAX after the splitting code in
> DM thinp is rewritten.
>
> v6:
>    - rebase on top of 4.2-rc6+
>    - fix discard/write_same 32bit bi_size overflow issue
>    - add ACKs/Review from Mike/Christoph/Martin/Steven

Why did you rebase it on top of 4.2-rc6+? If you had kept it at 4.2-rc1, 
it would have applied to for-4.3/core a lot more easily. Care to respin 
on top of that?


-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/