linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: two fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:25:02 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: two fixes

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com> wrote:
> On 08/14/2015 07:10 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jens,
>>>
>>> The 1st patch fixes one buffer overflow issue when reading
>>> sysfs file of hctx's pending.
>>>
>>> The 2nd patch fixes one race between timeout and request freeing,
>>> which also simplifies implementation of blk_mq_tag_to_rq() a lot.
>>
>>
>> Ping...
>
>
> Sorry, 1/2 is a no brainer, needed a bit of time to look at 2/2. I think it
> looks fine, and I like how it simplifies (and gets rid of) the flush special
> case tag lookup. Applied.

Great thanks, :-)Thanks,


Ming
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/