linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] staging: most: NULL comparison style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:30:21 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] staging: most: NULL comparison style

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:31:00PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> > According to the kernel coding style the NULL check should not be
> > written as [variable] == NULL or [variable] != NULL.
> 
> It seems this not documented in Documentation/CodingStyle .
Yes, it is not in the CodingStyle file. But mostly it is the convention
that is followed. And in CodingStyle file if you see the "The rationale
for using gotos is:" section, you will see in the example function the
test is done like: if (!buffer).
Anyways, frankly speaking I know commit message is bad but I could not
think of anything else other than the one I wrote. Any ideas please...

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/