linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:25:29 +0800
From:	Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver

Hi Rafael,

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:10:44 AM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > MT8173 is a ARMv8 based SoC with 2 clusters. All CPUs in a single cluster
>> > share the same power and clock domain. This series tries to add cpufreq support
>> > for MT8173 SoC. The v6 of this series is resent with Acks added.
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> Not sure if I has missed the merge window.
>> Do I have chance to have this series merged for 4.3?
>
> Yes, it should make it.
>
>> Would you please take [1,2] of this series?

Thanks.

>
> I'm not sure what you mean.  Are you withdrawing the [3/3]?

The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the patch which
introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver. So it will
cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure how this
should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC maintainer
tree?

@Matthias?

Thanks

Best Regards,
Pi-Cheng

[1] https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek.git v4.2-next/arm64
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2021379

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/