linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/16] x86/efi: Get entropy through EFI random number generator protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:17:50 +0800
From:	joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:	"Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/16] x86/efi: Get entropy through EFI random number
 generator protocol

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:26:20PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug, at 02:16:25PM, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > +
> > +static unsigned long efi_get_rng64(efi_system_table_t *sys_table,
> > +				   void **rng_handle)
> > +{
> > +	const struct efi_config *efi_early = __efi_early();
> > +	efi_rng_protocol_64 *rng = NULL;
> > +	efi_guid_t rng_proto = EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL_GUID;
> > +	u64 *handles = (u64 *)(unsigned long)rng_handle;
> > +	efi_status_t status;
> > +	unsigned long rng_number;
> > +
> > +	status = efi_call_early(handle_protocol, handles[0],
> > +				&rng_proto, (void **)&rng);
> > +	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > +		efi_printk(sys_table, "Failed to get EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL handles\n");
> > +
> > +	if (status == EFI_SUCCESS && rng) {
> > +		status = efi_early->call((unsigned long)rng->get_rng, rng, NULL,
> > +					sizeof(rng_number), &rng_number);
> 
> Actually, one thing just occurred to me - you're not passing an
> RNGAlgorithm value and are relying upon the firmware's default
> implementation.
> 
> I don't think that's a safe bet, the default could be anything and
> might vary across implementations.
> 

I didn't set specific RNGAlgorithm because different BIOS may
set different algorithm as default, it's also a kind of random situation
to provide uncertainty.

On the other hand, if the specific RNGAlgorithm doesn't support by BIOS
then EFI stub still need use BIOS's _default_ algorithm to get random
value.

> Can we do a little better here and pick a "preferred" algorithm
> instead of the default?
> 
> -- 
> Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Per EDK2 implementation, EFI_RNG_ALGORITHM_SP800_90_CTR_256 is the default
algorithm that provided by driver, and EFI_RNG_ALGORITHM_RAW is the second
algorithm supported by EDK2. BIOS vendor need to write driver to support
others.

Maybe using EFI_RNG_ALGORITHM_SP800_90_CTR_256 as the default RNGAlgorithm
in efi_random can cover the most widely UEFI implementation, but when BIOS
do not support EFI_RNG_ALGORITHM_SP800_90_CTR_256 then kernel still need
use BIOS's _default_ setting.

I hope your suggestion.


Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/