| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:14:07 -0600 From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com> To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcache revert On 08/31/2015 01:00 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Linus, please pull; this reverts a patch from Jens that was committed without > CCing be or being mailed out to any of the lists. Said patch wasn't in any way a > functional change and is something that damn well should have been discussed. > > Jens - what the goddamn fuck!? You've never touched the bcache code until now, > and when you finally get interested this is what you do!? > > While I am sympathetic to the arguments in favor of your patch, there _are_ some > damn good reasons I did it the way I did. If you want to have that discussion, > feel free to mail your patch out again after the revert. The patch was part of a larger series that I was working on, and I just wanted to flush out that dependency. Christoph review and acked it, it was by no means a sneaking in of a patch. So calm down. Is there a bug? The previous code was crap, having hidden returns in macros is horrible. The upstream bcache code has been effectively unmaintained for more than a year, and THIS patch is now a problem? Get real. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists