linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:40:33 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori,

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next.  This cannto work.
> Please rebase this onto Linus' tree (or some other stable base).
> 
> I cannot use your tree in this state, so it will be dropped from
> linux-next until it is fixed.  Also, Linus cannot pull it in this state.

And now your tree conatins lots and lots of very old commits that do
not even have Signed-off-by tags :-(.  The version I have been using
has a HEAD of commit:

99bcfda85f66 "Revert "asm-generic: {get,put}_user ptr argument evaluate only 1 time""

(which, it turns out" also has no Signed-off-by :-()

Maybe you should reset your tree to that and try to move on from there.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/