linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] perf tools: Move tracing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:43:53 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Raphaël Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] perf tools: Move tracing_path stuff under same
 namespace

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 02:06:50PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug, at 05:06:37PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > 
> > no problem with moving it over to the lib
> > 
> > how about having api/fs/tpfs
> >                  or     eventsfs
> >                  or     tracingfs
> > 
> > 
> > doing the same as tracing_path* stuff ATM
> 
> But we're talking about tracing path components here right and not a
> file system? It'd make more sense to me to have this logically above
> the file system layers.

right, on the other side it's fs related.. just holder
for preffered place to read tracepoints from

I dont have strong opinion on where to place it,
but I dont see better place.. fs/tracing_path.c ?

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/