linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: Make qcom_smem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:50:24 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Cc:	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: Make qcom_smem_get() return a pointer

On 08/31/2015 09:50 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 31 Aug 18:41 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> This is on top of the smd and smem big endian support.
>>
> How sneaky of you, then we need to approve those patches before we
> add new consumers of this API...

I was being explicit to remove any subterfuge. I actually rebased this
to the end of the series, so I suspect it will apply fine without the
big endian stuff. This was mostly making a note that I tested this on
top of those commits.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/