lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:32:12 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf: bug, kernel ignores the buffer size on large read

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> I think we should try and just ban events with a read_size > 64k; that's
> one _large_ group -- there's other issues with that as well I imagine.

yes, I don't really have a use case for this, I just noticed the problem 
because Debian apparently bumped the default file descriptor limit from
1k to 64k and suddenly some of my perf_event_test suite started failing
in interesting ways.

The limit for read() would come down to about 4k events per group assuming 
you also have ID enabled.

The complication is that header_size is calculated similarly and lots of 
other things get added in, and a lot of it is done with u16 math.  So I 
have no idea if there's a possibility for creating sampled events that can 
corrupt the mmap buffer.

Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ