lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 7 Sep 2015 09:32:26 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [4.2, Regression] Queued spinlocks cause major XFS performance
 regression

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:25:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Something like so...
> 
> ---
> Subject: locking: Fix virt test-and-set lock implementation
> 
> Dave ran into horrible performance on a VM without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
> set and Linus noted that the test-and-set implementation was retarded.
> 
> One should spin on the variable with a load, not a rmw.
> 
> While there, remove the queued from the name, as the lock isn't queued
> at all, but a simple test-and-set.
> 
> Reported-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
     0      1600000            0     319511.8          9398733
     0      3200000            0     301517.9          9516230
     0      4800000            0     300357.6          9676651
     0      6400000            0     282167.8         11513255

Looks OK.

Tested-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ