linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf tests: Add arch tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Sep 2015 14:58:18 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Kanaka Juvva <kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com>,
	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf tests: Add arch tests

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 08:02:19PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> 
> To encourage developers to contribute arch-specific tests without
> feeling guilty about messing up the generic perf tests, this patch
> series introduces "arch tests" and then adds a test for the Intel CQM
> perf code which was used to trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE(), fixed in commit
> 2c534c0da0a6 ("perf/x86/intel/cqm: Return cached counter value from
> IRQ context").
> 
> The concept of additional lists of tests, like the arch tests, can be
> taken further in the future, for instance Arnaldo has expressed
> interest in adding tests that require root permissions, etc.
> 
> The patch series is based on tip/perf/core.

please base this over Arnaldo's perf/core

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/