linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:09:15 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, smueller@...onox.de,
	hpa@...or.com, sean.m.gulley@...el.com, mouli_7982@...oo.com,
	vinodh.gopal@...el.com, james.guilford@...el.com,
	wajdi.k.feghali@...el.com, jussi.kivilinna@....fi,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions
 optimized SHA1 & SHA256

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 01:10:27PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> 
> Mmmm..., this is a restructuring of the algorithms within
> the glue code into multiple drivers instead of one and exposing
> them all.  It is a bit orthogonal to the intention of this
> patch set.  I think it is better that I create a 
> separate patch on the glue code on top of this patch set 
> to implement this.
> 
> Herbert, do you agree with this approach?

Yes I think we can work on the individual crypto registration
separately from this patch-set.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/