linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:01:58 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>, minchan@...nel.org,
	sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, ddstreet@...e.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator

On 09/14/2015 03:49 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> While using ZRAM on a small RAM footprint devices, together with
> KSM,
> I ran into several occasions when moving pages from compressed swap back
> into the "normal" part of RAM caused significant latencies in system

I'm sure Minchan will want to hear the details of that :)

> operation. By using zbud I lose in compression ratio but gain in
> determinism, lower latencies and lower fragmentation, so in the coming

I doubt the "lower fragmentation" part given what I've read about the 
design of zbud and zsmalloc?

> patches I tried to generalize what I've done to enable zbud for zram so far.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/