linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: add support for s390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:53:53 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	heicars2@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: add support for s390

On 09/09/2015 12:46 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 11:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>>> On 09/09/2015 10:45 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> On 09/09/2015 10:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>>> Re-ping. Can someone pull this into their tree?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Kees
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>>>>>> This adds support for s390 to the seccomp selftests. Some improvements
>>>>>> were made to enhance the accuracy of failure reporting, and additional
>>>>>> tests were added to validate assumptions about the currently traced
>>>>>> syscall. Also adds early asserts for running on older kernels to avoid
>>>>>> noise when the seccomp syscall is not implemented.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry looks like it got lost in my LinuxCon backlog. I will queue it
>>>> up for 4.3-rc1.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm. It doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next. Based on your comment
>>>
>>> "This applies on top of -next, following the addition of the powerpc
>>> tests."
>>
>> Well, it was -next when I sent it. :) The powerpc changes are now in
>> Linus's tree, so there should be no problem. Is your linux-kselftest
>> merged with 4.3-rc yet?
>>
> 
> Kees,
> 
> I will get this into 4.3-rc2 as this patch fixes failure paths with
> other fixes I am planning to send in rc2. Thanks for the ping on this.
> 

Applied to linux-kselftest fixes for 4.3-rc2

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/