linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:49:57 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:	Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc:	minchan@...nel.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
	ddstreet@...e.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator

On (09/14/15 15:49), Vitaly Wool wrote:
> While using ZRAM on a small RAM footprint devices, together with KSM,
> I ran into several occasions when moving pages from compressed swap back
> into the "normal" part of RAM caused significant latencies in system operation.
> By using zbud I lose in compression ratio but gain in determinism, lower
> latencies and lower fragmentation, so in the coming patches I tried to
> generalize what I've done to enable zbud for zram so far.
> 

do you have CONFIG_PGTABLE_MAPPING enabled or disabled? or
kmap_atomic/memcpy/kunmap_atomic is not the root cause here?
can you provide more details please?

	-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/