linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:15:05 +0200
From:	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC:	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver

Hi Sascha,

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 03:12:10PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> > 
> > Any comments about this version? Maybe you missed it since you answered
> > me on the RFC version. Of course I'll do the changes you requested for
> > the next version (remove gpio_request_*() stuff and add macros for gpio
> > muxing case).
> 
> The binding looks good to me. I wonder where the pinmux defines have
> gone, they were part of the last series but not of this one.

It was because I planned to send it when I will add pinctrl of all the
devices.

I'll add it for the next version since you agree the bindings.

Regards

Ludovic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/