lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:38:36 +0530 From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <paulus@...ba.org>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>, <anton@...ba.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>, <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <vdavydov@...allels.com>, <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org> Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with for_each_node in list lru The functions used in the patch are in slowpath, which gets called whenever alloc_super is called during mounts. Though this should not make difference for the architectures with sequential numa node ids, for the powerpc which can potentially have sparse node ids (for e.g., 4 node system having numa ids, 0,1,16,17 is common), this patch saves some unnecessary allocations for non existing numa nodes. Even without that saving, perhaps patch makes code more readable. [ Take memcg_aware check outside for_each loop: Vldimir] Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> --- mm/list_lru.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Changes in V2: - Take memcg_aware check outside for_each loop (Vldimir) - Add comment that node 0 should always be present (Vladimir) diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c index 909eca2..60cd6dd 100644 --- a/mm/list_lru.c +++ b/mm/list_lru.c @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ static void list_lru_unregister(struct list_lru *lru) #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru) { + /* + * This needs node 0 to be always present, even + * in the systems supporting sparse numa ids. + */ return !!lru->node[0].memcg_lrus; } @@ -377,16 +381,20 @@ static int memcg_init_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) { - if (!memcg_aware) - lru->node[i].memcg_lrus = NULL; - else if (memcg_init_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i])) + if (!memcg_aware) + return 0; + + for_each_node(i) { + if (memcg_init_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i])) goto fail; } return 0; fail: - for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) + for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) { + if (!lru->node[i].memcg_lrus) + continue; memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i]); + } return -ENOMEM; } @@ -397,7 +405,7 @@ static void memcg_destroy_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru) if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) return; - for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) + for_each_node(i) memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i]); } @@ -409,16 +417,20 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) return 0; - for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) { + for_each_node(i) { if (memcg_update_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i], old_size, new_size)) goto fail; } return 0; fail: - for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) + for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) { + if (!lru->node[i].memcg_lrus) + continue; + memcg_cancel_update_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i], old_size, new_size); + } return -ENOMEM; } @@ -430,7 +442,7 @@ static void memcg_cancel_update_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) return; - for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) + for_each_node(i) memcg_cancel_update_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i], old_size, new_size); } @@ -485,7 +497,7 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) return; - for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) + for_each_node(i) memcg_drain_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i], src_idx, dst_idx); } @@ -522,7 +534,7 @@ int __list_lru_init(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware, if (!lru->node) goto out; - for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) { + for_each_node(i) { spin_lock_init(&lru->node[i].lock); if (key) lockdep_set_class(&lru->node[i].lock, key); -- 1.7.11.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists