linux-kernel - [tip:irq/urgent] irqchip/renesas-irqc: Use a separate lockdep class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:49:35 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Geert Uytterhoeven <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, magnus.damm@...il.com, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
	mingo@...nel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com, jason@...edaemon.net
Subject: [tip:irq/urgent] irqchip/renesas-irqc:
  Use a separate lockdep class

Commit-ID:  b1370658804510f6a1c0517a8ff1c9534d371edd
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/b1370658804510f6a1c0517a8ff1c9534d371edd
Author:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:42:53 +0200
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:06:29 +0200

irqchip/renesas-irqc: Use a separate lockdep class

The renesas-irqc interrupt controller is cascaded to the GIC. Hence when
propagating wake-up settings to its parent interrupt controller, the
following lockdep warning is printed:

    =============================================
    [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
    4.2.0-ape6evm-10725-g50fcd7643c034198 #280 Not tainted
    ---------------------------------------------
    s2ram/1072 is trying to acquire lock:
    (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c008d3fc>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0x98

    but task is already holding lock:
    (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c008d3fc>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0x98

    other info that might help us debug this:
    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	  CPU0
	  ----
     lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
     lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

    May be due to missing lock nesting notation

    6 locks held by s2ram/1072:
    #0:  (sb_writers#7){.+.+.+}, at: [<c012eb14>] __sb_start_write+0xa0/0xa8
    #1:  (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c019396c>] kernfs_fop_write+0x4c/0x1bc
    #2:  (s_active#24){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0193974>] kernfs_fop_write+0x54/0x1bc
    #3:  (pm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c008213c>] pm_suspend+0x10c/0x510
    #4:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02af3c4>] __device_suspend+0xdc/0x2cc
    #5:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c008d3fc>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0x98

    stack backtrace:
    CPU: 0 PID: 1072 Comm: s2ram Not tainted 4.2.0-ape6evm-10725-g50fcd7643c034198 #280
    Hardware name: Generic R8A73A4 (Flattened Device Tree)
    [<c0018078>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c00144f0>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
    [<c00144f0>] (show_stack) from [<c0451f14>] (dump_stack+0x88/0x98)
    [<c0451f14>] (dump_stack) from [<c007b29c>] (__lock_acquire+0x15cc/0x20e4)
    [<c007b29c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c007c6e0>] (lock_acquire+0xac/0x12c)
    [<c007c6e0>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0457c00>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x40/0x54)
    [<c0457c00>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c008d3fc>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0x98)
    [<c008d3fc>] (__irq_get_desc_lock) from [<c008ebbc>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf8)
    [<c008ebbc>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c0260770>] (irqc_irq_set_wake+0x20/0x4c)
    [<c0260770>] (irqc_irq_set_wake) from [<c008ec28>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf8)
    [<c008ec28>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c02cb8c0>] (gpio_keys_suspend+0x74/0xc0)
    [<c02cb8c0>] (gpio_keys_suspend) from [<c02ae8cc>] (dpm_run_callback+0x54/0x124)

Avoid this false positive by using a separate lockdep class for IRQC
interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441798974-25716-2-git-send-email-geert%2Brenesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-irqc.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-irqc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-irqc.c
index 2aa3add..4652cc3 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-irqc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-irqc.c
@@ -150,6 +150,12 @@ static irqreturn_t irqc_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	return IRQ_NONE;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This lock class tells lockdep that IRQC irqs are in a different
+ * category than their parents, so it won't report false recursion.
+ */
+static struct lock_class_key irqc_irq_lock_class;
+
 static int irqc_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
 			       irq_hw_number_t hw)
 {
@@ -157,6 +163,7 @@ static int irqc_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
 
 	irqc_dbg(&p->irq[hw], "map");
 	irq_set_chip_data(virq, h->host_data);
+	irq_set_lockdep_class(virq, &irqc_irq_lock_class);
 	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &p->irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
 	return 0;
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/