| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 23:46:07 +0530
From: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@...escale.com>
To: <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
CC: <scottwood@...escale.com>,
poonam aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@...escale.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/device-tree: bindings for DSP cores/clusters for Freescale SOCs
From: poonam aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@...escale.com>
Device Tree Bindings for DSP CPU clusters and DSP CPUs for Freescale PowerPC
SOCs which have DSP CPUs in addition to PowerPC CPUs.
For example B4860 has 3 DSP clusters which have 2 SC3900 cores each.
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@...escale.com>
---
- based of: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
branch master
This patch was sent earlier and some comments were received. Some have been
taken care; others we can further discuss. Apologize for not following up
on them in time.
.../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-cpus.txt | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-cpus.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-cpus.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6d901ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-cpus.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+===================================================================
+Binding for DSP CPU clusters and DSP CPUs for Freescale SOCs which
+have DSP CPUs in addition to PowerPC cpus.
+Copyright 2013 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
+
+Power Architecture CPUs in Freescale SOCs are represented in device trees as
+per the definition in ePAPR.
+
+Required properties for DSP CPU cluster:
+- compatible : should be "fsl,sc3900-cluster".
+- reg : should contain the cluster index
+
+Required properties for DSP CPU:
+- compatible : should be "fsl,sc3900".
+- reg : should contain index of DSP CPU within the DSP clsuter.
+- next-level-cache : should point to the phandle of the next-level L2 cache.
+
+Example for B4860:
+B4860 SOC of Freescale has 3 DSP clusters. Each DSP cluster has 2 DSP CPUs each.
+The DSP CPUs are SC3900. There is a shared L2 cache per DSP cluster.
+ dsp-clusters {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ dsp-cluster0 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "fsl,sc3900-cluster";
+ reg = <0>;
+
+ dsp0: dsp@0 {
+ compatible = "fsl,sc3900";
+ reg = <0>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_2>;
+ };
+ dsp1: dsp@1 {
+ compatible = "fsl,sc3900";
+ reg = <1>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_2>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ dsp-cluster1 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "fsl,sc3900-cluster";
+ reg = <1>;
+
+ dsp2: dsp@2 {
+ compatible = "fsl,sc3900";
+ reg = <2>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_3>;
+ };
+ dsp3: dsp@3 {
+ compatible = "fsl,sc3900";
+ reg = <3>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_3>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ dsp-cluster2 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "fsl,sc3900-cluster";
+ reg = <2>;
+
+ dsp4: dsp@4 {
+ compatible = "fsl,sc3900";
+ reg = <4>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_4>;
+ };
+ dsp5: dsp@5 {
+ compatible = "fsl,sc3900";
+ reg = <5>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_4>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists