lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:48:51 +0100
From:	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
CC:	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] SUNRPC: Fix a race in xs_reset_transport

On 18/09/15 23:00, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 12:51 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 12:19 +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>>> On 16/09/15 12:17, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:35:49 +0100
>>>> "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> +		write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>>>>> +		return;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +	sock = transport->sock;
>>>>> +
>>>>>    	transport->inet = NULL;
>>>>>    	transport->sock = NULL;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -833,6 +838,10 @@ static void xs_reset_transport(struct
>>>>> sock_xprt *transport)
>>>>>    	xs_restore_old_callbacks(transport, sk);
>>>>>    	xprt_clear_connected(xprt);
>>>>>    	write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>>>>> +

...

>>
>> So how about the following patch? It should apply cleanly on top of
>> the
>> first one (which is still needed, btw).
>
> Having thought some more about this, I think the safest thing in order
> to avoid races is simply to have the shutdown set XPRT_LOCKED. That way
> we can keep the current desirable behaviour of closing the socket
> automatically any time the server initiates a close, while still
> preventing it during shutdown.
>
> 8<-------------------------------------------------------------------
>  From 3e1c9d8092e2fa4509d84a00fcf21e7e0c581fe2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:53:24 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Lock the transport layer on shutdown
>
> Avoid all races with the connect/disconnect handlers by taking the
> transport lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
> ---
>   net/sunrpc/xprt.c | 6 ++++++
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> index ab5dd621ae0c..2e98f4a243e5 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> @@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ static void xprt_autoclose(struct work_struct *work)
>   	clear_bit(XPRT_CLOSE_WAIT, &xprt->state);
>   	xprt->ops->close(xprt);
>   	xprt_release_write(xprt, NULL);
> +	wake_up_bit(&xprt->state, XPRT_LOCKED);
>   }
>
>   /**
> @@ -723,6 +724,7 @@ void xprt_unlock_connect(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, void *cookie)
>   	xprt->ops->release_xprt(xprt, NULL);
>   out:
>   	spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
> +	wake_up_bit(&xprt->state, XPRT_LOCKED);
>   }
>
>   /**
> @@ -1394,6 +1396,10 @@ out:
>   static void xprt_destroy(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
>   {
>   	dprintk("RPC:       destroying transport %p\n", xprt);
> +
> +	/* Exclude transport connect/disconnect handlers */
> +	wait_on_bit_lock(&xprt->state, XPRT_LOCKED, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +
>   	del_timer_sync(&xprt->timer);
>
>   	rpc_xprt_debugfs_unregister(xprt);
>


That works for me, please feel free to add:

Reported-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Tested-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>



Thanks
Suzuki


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ