linux-kernel - Re: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH] fcoe:Fix incorrect use of non wrapper version of skb_buff helper function in fcoe_percpu_recieve

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0700
From:	Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>
To:	Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc:	vasu.dev@...el.com, fcoe-devel@...n-fcoe.org, JBottomley@...n.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH] fcoe:Fix incorrect use of non wrapper
 version of skb_buff helper function in fcoe_percpu_recieve_thread

On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 06:22:39PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This fixes the incorrect use of the non wrapper version of the
> function skb_dequeue in fcoe_percpu_receive_thread to use the
> wrapper version as we need to protect avoid other users from
> concurrently access on the sk_buff_head tmp used as the link
> list head for this call to skb_queue.

The sk_buff_head tmp is a local reference on the stack, so not accessed
concurrently from anywhere.  It's set with skb_queue_splice_init while
holding the lock for the real fcoe_rx_list, specifically to batch
process without repeatedly taking and dropping the lock.

Nak, flawed reasoning for justification.

- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/