linux-kernel - Re: ARM64 readahead: fault retry breaks mmap file read random detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 07:15:00 -0700
From:	Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...ionio.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Vladimir Murzin <Vladimir.Murzin@....com>,
	Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
	David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	James Morse <James.Morse@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ARM64 readahead: fault retry breaks mmap file read random
 detection

On 09/21/2015 04:51 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:36:40PM +0100, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
>> On 09/21/2015 02:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 09:39:50PM +0100, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
>>>> Description from commit 45cac65b0fcd
>>>>       ("readahead: fault retry breaks mmap file read random detection")
>>>> . . .
>>>> Yup, arm64 needs this too! Random read improves by 250%, sequential
>>>> read improves by 40%, and random write by 400% to an eMMC device with
>>>> dm crypto wrapped around it.
>>> Thanks for this. This must've gone in whilst we were developing the initial
>>> version of the arm64 port and has since gone unnoticed.
>>>
>>> I'll queue it on the arm64 fixes branch and send a pull request after
>>> some testing.
>>>
>> As noted, this fix may need to be propagated to all the arch-specific
>> code, I was not in a position to check this out on arm (32 bit) and the
>> benchmarking code I used did not immediately port to 32-bit.
> You lost me; which arch-specific code are you referring to? The original
> patch (in mainline) touches a whole bunch of architectures.
>
> Will
I see I am mistaken, arm64 was the _only_ one I see that is missing ... 
<grin>

Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/