lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2015 01:48:38 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, will.deacon@....com, hpa@...or.com,
	dvyukov@...gle.com, mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] atomic: Implement atomic_read_ctrl()

Commit-ID:  e3e72ab80a3fac0b88e07d358a2c75724ccd66b4
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/e3e72ab80a3fac0b88e07d358a2c75724ccd66b4
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:22:52 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:54:29 +0200

atomic: Implement atomic_read_ctrl()

Provide atomic_read_ctrl() to mirror READ_ONCE_CTRL(), such that we can
more conveniently use atomics in control dependencies.

Since we can assume atomic_read() implies a READ_ONCE(), we must only
emit an extra smp_read_barrier_depends() in order to upgrade to
READ_ONCE_CTRL() semantics.

Requested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oleg@...hat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150918115637.GM3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 17 +++++++++--------
 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h |  3 ++-
 include/linux/atomic.h            | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 2ba8461..41ffd7e 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -637,7 +637,8 @@ as follows:
 	b = p;  /* BUG: Compiler and CPU can both reorder!!! */
 
 Finally, the READ_ONCE_CTRL() includes an smp_read_barrier_depends()
-that DEC Alpha needs in order to respect control depedencies.
+that DEC Alpha needs in order to respect control depedencies. Alternatively
+use one of atomic{,64}_read_ctrl().
 
 So don't leave out the READ_ONCE_CTRL().
 
@@ -796,9 +797,9 @@ site: https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/ppcmem/index.html.
 
 In summary:
 
-  (*) Control dependencies must be headed by READ_ONCE_CTRL().
-      Or, as a much less preferable alternative, interpose
-      smp_read_barrier_depends() between a READ_ONCE() and the
+  (*) Control dependencies must be headed by READ_ONCE_CTRL(),
+      atomic{,64}_read_ctrl(). Or, as a much less preferable alternative,
+      interpose smp_read_barrier_depends() between a READ_ONCE() and the
       control-dependent write.
 
   (*) Control dependencies can order prior loads against later stores.
@@ -820,10 +821,10 @@ In summary:
       and WRITE_ONCE() can help to preserve the needed conditional.
 
   (*) Control dependencies require that the compiler avoid reordering the
-      dependency into nonexistence.  Careful use of READ_ONCE_CTRL()
-      or smp_read_barrier_depends() can help to preserve your control
-      dependency.  Please see the Compiler Barrier section for more
-      information.
+      dependency into nonexistence.  Careful use of READ_ONCE_CTRL(),
+      atomic{,64}_read_ctrl() or smp_read_barrier_depends() can help to
+      preserve your control dependency.  Please see the Compiler Barrier
+      section for more information.
 
   (*) Control dependencies pair normally with other types of barriers.
 
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h b/include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h
index c7a5c1a..8942cdc 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ typedef atomic_t atomic_long_t;
 #endif
 
 #define ATOMIC_LONG_READ_OP(mo)						\
-static inline long atomic_long_read##mo(atomic_long_t *l)		\
+static inline long atomic_long_read##mo(const atomic_long_t *l)		\
 {									\
 	ATOMIC_LONG_PFX(_t) *v = (ATOMIC_LONG_PFX(_t) *)l;		\
 									\
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static inline long atomic_long_read##mo(atomic_long_t *l)		\
 }
 ATOMIC_LONG_READ_OP()
 ATOMIC_LONG_READ_OP(_acquire)
+ATOMIC_LONG_READ_OP(_ctrl)
 
 #undef ATOMIC_LONG_READ_OP
 
diff --git a/include/linux/atomic.h b/include/linux/atomic.h
index 29dafa1..e326469 100644
--- a/include/linux/atomic.h
+++ b/include/linux/atomic.h
@@ -4,6 +4,15 @@
 #include <asm/atomic.h>
 #include <asm/barrier.h>
 
+#ifndef atomic_read_ctrl
+static inline int atomic_read_ctrl(const atomic_t *v)
+{
+	int val = atomic_read(v);
+	smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Enforce control dependency. */
+	return val;
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Relaxed variants of xchg, cmpxchg and some atomic operations.
  *
@@ -455,6 +464,15 @@ static inline int atomic_dec_if_positive(atomic_t *v)
 #include <asm-generic/atomic64.h>
 #endif
 
+#ifndef atomic64_read_ctrl
+static inline long long atomic64_read_ctrl(const atomic64_t *v)
+{
+	long long val = atomic64_read(v);
+	smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Enforce control dependency. */
+	return val;
+}
+#endif
+
 #ifndef atomic64_andnot
 static inline void atomic64_andnot(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
 {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ