| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:41:51 -0400 From: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@...marydata.com> To: kernel test robot <ying.huang@...el.com> Cc: lkp@...org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [lkp] [nfsd] 4aac1bf05b: -2.9% fsmark.files_per_sec On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:49:32 +0800 kernel test robot <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote: > FYI, we noticed the below changes on > > ========================================================================================= > tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/iterations/nr_threads/disk/fs/fs2/filesize/test_size/sync_method/nr_directories/nr_files_per_directory: > lkp-ne04/fsmark/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/1x/32t/1HDD/xfs/nfsv4/5K/400M/fsyncBeforeClose/16d/256fpd > > commit: > cd2d35ff27c4fda9ba73b0aa84313e8e20ce4d2c > 4aac1bf05b053a201a4b392dd9a684fb2b7e6103 > A question... I think my tree should now contain a fix for this, but with a performance regression like this it's difficult to know for sure. Is there some (automated) way to request that the KTR redo this test? If not, will I get a note saying "problem seems to now be fixed" or do I just take a lack of further emails from the KTR about this as a sign that it's resolved? Thanks! -- Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@...marydata.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists