linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/3] regulator: axp20x: set supply names for AXP22X DC1SW/DC5LDO internally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:39:46 +0800
From:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED
	DEVICE TREE BINDINGS), linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list),
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM PORT)
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] regulator: axp20x: set supply names for AXP22X DC1SW/DC5LDO internally

The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP22X are internally chained
to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
parent regulator names for the supply regulator property.

Since they are internally connected, the relationship should not be
represented in the device tree, but handled internally by the driver.

This patch has the driver remember the regulator names for the parent
DCDC1/DCDC5, and use them as supply names for DC1SW/DC5LDO.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
index a9567af7cec0..35de22fdb7a0 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
@@ -196,10 +196,10 @@ static const struct regulator_desc axp22x_regulators[] = {
 	AXP_DESC(AXP22X, DCDC5, "dcdc5", "vin5", 1000, 2550, 50,
 		 AXP22X_DCDC5_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(5)),
 	/* secondary switchable output of DCDC1 */
-	AXP_DESC_SW(AXP22X, DC1SW, "dc1sw", "dcdc1", 1600, 3400, 100,
+	AXP_DESC_SW(AXP22X, DC1SW, "dc1sw", NULL, 1600, 3400, 100,
 		    AXP22X_DCDC1_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(7)),
 	/* LDO regulator internally chained to DCDC5 */
-	AXP_DESC(AXP22X, DC5LDO, "dc5ldo", "dcdc5", 700, 1400, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP22X, DC5LDO, "dc5ldo", NULL, 700, 1400, 100,
 		 AXP22X_DC5LDO_V_OUT, 0x7, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(0)),
 	AXP_DESC(AXP22X, ALDO1, "aldo1", "aldoin", 700, 3300, 100,
 		 AXP22X_ALDO1_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(6)),
@@ -350,6 +350,8 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	};
 	int ret, i, nregulators;
 	u32 workmode;
+	const char *axp22x_dc1_name = axp22x_regulators[AXP22X_DCDC1].name;
+	const char *axp22x_dc5_name = axp22x_regulators[AXP22X_DCDC5].name;
 
 	switch (axp20x->variant) {
 	case AXP202_ID:
@@ -371,8 +373,37 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	axp20x_regulator_parse_dt(pdev);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nregulators; i++) {
-		rdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, &regulators[i],
-					       &config);
+		const struct regulator_desc *desc = &regulators[i];
+		struct regulator_desc *new_desc;
+
+		/*
+		 * Regulators DC1SW and DC5LDO are connected internally,
+		 * so we have to handle their supply names separately.
+		 *
+		 * We always register the regulators in proper sequence,
+		 * so the supply names are correctly read. See the last
+		 * part of this loop to see where we save the DT defined
+		 * name.
+		 */
+		if (regulators == axp22x_regulators) {
+			if (i == AXP22X_DC1SW) {
+				new_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+							sizeof(*desc),
+							GFP_KERNEL);
+				*new_desc = regulators[i];
+				new_desc->supply_name = axp22x_dc1_name;
+				desc = new_desc;
+			} else if (i == AXP22X_DC5LDO) {
+				new_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+							sizeof(*desc),
+							GFP_KERNEL);
+				*new_desc = regulators[i];
+				new_desc->supply_name = axp22x_dc5_name;
+				desc = new_desc;
+			}
+		}
+
+		rdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, desc, &config);
 		if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register %s\n",
 				regulators[i].name);
@@ -388,6 +419,21 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 				dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set workmode on %s\n",
 					rdev->desc->name);
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Save AXP22X DCDC1 / DCDC5 regulator names for later.
+		 */
+		if (regulators == axp22x_regulators) {
+			/* Can we use rdev->constraints->name instead? */
+			if (i == AXP22X_DCDC1)
+				of_property_read_string(rdev->dev.of_node,
+							"regulator-name",
+							&axp22x_dc1_name);
+			else if (i == AXP22X_DCDC5)
+				of_property_read_string(rdev->dev.of_node,
+							"regulator-name",
+							&axp22x_dc5_name);
+		}
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.5.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/