lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 3 Oct 2015 08:08:12 +0000
From:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
	"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of/fdt: Allow memory node and root to have different
 size/address cells

On Thursday 01 October 2015 05:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 01 October 2015 17:48:21 Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> Currently memory node parsing uses root "#size-cells", "#address-cells"
>> This doesn't work correctly when memory address/size is different or
>> greater than root's.
>>
>> e.g. ARC 32-bit systems implementing physical adressing extension and
>> say 4GB of memory. All peripherals mappings stay within the 4GB (so root
>> address/size cells remain 1 each), only the memory node address/size
>> cells needs to specify greater than 32-bits as below
>>
>>         memory {
>>                 device_type = "memory";
>>                 reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x1 0x00000000>;  /* 4 GB */
>>                 #address-cells = <2>;
>>                 #size-cells = <2>;
>>         };
>>
>> This patch lets me boot a ARC system with PAE40 + 4GB of memory specified
>> as above and fails to boot otherwise as memory parsing doesn't populate
>> right base, size.
>>
> This looks wrong: the #address-cells property in a device node is used
> to parse the reg property of its child nodes, not the node itself.
>
> The only way to list memory like this is to put #size-cells=<2>
> into the root node. All lower bus nodes can then use the
> normal #address-cells/#size-cells again and use a ranges property
> to convert the register ranges so you don't need to update all
> nodes.

Thx for taking a look Arnd. I changed the DT per your suggestion and that works
equally well.

Thx,
-Vineet

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ