linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND] drm: panel-simple: add URT UMSH-8596MD-xT panel support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:58:28 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Cc:	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
	ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] drm: panel-simple: add URT UMSH-8596MD-xT panel
 support

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:33:49AM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> Hi Emil,
> 
> Thanks for your response,
> 
> On 04.10.2015 12:43, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > Hi Maciej,
> > 
> > On 2 October 2015 at 22:40, Maciej S. Szmigiero
> > <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name> wrote:
> >> Anybody here?
> >>
> >> I've already submitted this patch two times but received no response...
> >>
> > Seems that the maintainer (Thierry) isn't Cc'ed.
> 
> Yes, he was Cc'ed - see for example https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/512858/ .

Sorry, I never received any of your earlier patches. It's in none of my
mailboxes nor was it classified as spam. Even searching by message ID
doesn't give me a positive hit.

> > You might want to
> > split the DT binding and vendor prefix to separate patches.
> 
> Do you mean to first submit new vendor prefix then panel patch with docs?
> Or even docs separately?

This should be three patches: the vendor prefix is usually a separate
patch and needs an Acked-by from one of the device tree bindings
maintainers. The binding itself should also be a separate patch and the
driver changes should come last.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)