[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:41:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5 v2] arm: add missing of_node_put
for_each_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration, so
a break out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
The of_node_put is duplicated in front of each error return, because the
function contains a later error return that is beyond the end of the
for_each_child_of_node and thus doesn't need of_node_put.
The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
// <smpl>
@@
expression root,e;
local idexpression child;
iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
@@
for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
... when != of_node_put(child)
when != e = child
(
return child;
|
+ of_node_put(child);
? return ...;
)
...
}
@@
expression root,e;
local idexpression child;
@@
for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
... when != of_node_put(child)
when != e = child
+ of_node_put(child);
? break;
...
}
... when != child
// </smpl>
Additionally, concatenated a string in an affected line to avoid introducing
a checkpatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
---
v2: Fixed the returns as well, adjusted a string in a test expression.
arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
index 11c54de..65addcb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
if (of_property_read_u32(cpu, "reg", &hwid)) {
pr_debug(" * %s missing reg property\n",
cpu->full_name);
+ of_node_put(cpu);
return;
}
@@ -108,8 +109,10 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
* 8 MSBs must be set to 0 in the DT since the reg property
* defines the MPIDR[23:0].
*/
- if (hwid & ~MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK)
+ if (hwid & ~MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK) {
+ of_node_put(cpu);
return;
+ }
/*
* Duplicate MPIDRs are a recipe for disaster.
@@ -119,9 +122,11 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
* to avoid matching valid MPIDR[23:0] values.
*/
for (j = 0; j < cpuidx; j++)
- if (WARN(tmp_map[j] == hwid, "Duplicate /cpu reg "
- "properties in the DT\n"))
+ if (WARN(tmp_map[j] == hwid,
+ "Duplicate /cpu reg properties in the DT\n")) {
+ of_node_put(cpu);
return;
+ }
/*
* Build a stashed array of MPIDR values. Numbering scheme
@@ -143,6 +148,7 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
"max cores %u, capping them\n",
cpuidx, nr_cpu_ids)) {
cpuidx = nr_cpu_ids;
+ of_node_put(cpu);
break;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists