lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:13:35 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, lkp@...org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	0day robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [string] 5f6f0801f5: BUG: KASan: out of bounds
 access in strlcpy+0xc8/0x250 at addr ffff88011a666ee0


* Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > * kernel test robot <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >> 
> >> git://internal_mailing_list_patch_tree Ingo-Molnar/string-Improve-the-generic-strlcpy-implementation
> >> commit 5f6f0801f5fdfce4984c6a14f99dbfbb417acb66 ("string: Improve the generic strlcpy() implementation")
> >
> > Hm, there's no such commit ID anywhere I can see - did you rebase my tree perhaps?
> 
> The test is for patch from LKML instead of git tree.  That is, you patch
> is tested via applying it to a -rc kernel.
> 
> Do you have a commit in your tree for this?  We can test that to confirm.

Yeah, I just made a merge that includes just to strscpy() related bits:

b94371b0917a Merge tag 'v4.3-rc5' into core/strings, to pick up strscpy() fixes

(Note, it might take a few minutes for korg git mirrors to pick up this merge.)

All that tree does is that it makes strlcpy() use strscpy():

> > +size_t strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t dst_size)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = strscpy(dst, src, dst_size);
> > +
> > +	/* Handle the insane and broken strlcpy() overflow return value: */
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return dst_size + strlen(src+dst_size);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(strlcpy);

Do you see the same KASAN failure with that commit? If my analysis below is 
correct, then the failure should go away.

Analysis:

The stack dump:

[   22.242067]  [<ffffffff8177a3e8>] strlcpy+0xc8/0x250
[   22.242067]  [<ffffffff8117b1b7>] cgroup_release_agent_write+0x67/0xa0
[   22.242067]  [<ffffffff81179925>] cgroup_file_write+0x75/0x180
[   22.242067]  [<ffffffff812af81e>] kernfs_fop_write+0x17e/0x210
[   22.242067]  [<ffffffff8121cf67>] __vfs_write+0x57/0x170
[   22.242067]  [<ffffffff8121d2bb>] vfs_write+0xeb/0x240

Implicates this strlcpy():

        spin_lock(&release_agent_path_lock);
        strlcpy(cgrp->root->release_agent_path, strstrip(buf),
                sizeof(cgrp->root->release_agent_path));
        spin_unlock(&release_agent_path_lock);

where:

include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:    char release_agent_path[PATH_MAX];

the target buffer sizing looks pretty robust (because simple).

And the input buffer side looks safe as well, by my reading:

'buf' here seems like a regular write operation, with a 'buf' and a 'size' 
parameter - layered in through various layers of abstraction:

 struct cftype::write, used in kernel/cgroup.c: cgroup_file_write()

 - no size checks, no guarantee that we have a string

this is called via:

 struct kernfs_ops::write via kernfs

which guarantees string termination in fs/kernfs/file.c's kernfs_fop_write():

        buf[len] = '\0';        /* guarantee string termination */

        ops = kernfs_ops(of->kn);
        if (ops->write)
                len = ops->write(of, buf, len, *ppos);

and that's a stable, private string local to the calling task.

So my guess is that this is the bug that got fixed by:

  990486c8af04 ("strscpy: zero any trailing garbage bytes in the destination")

that that systemd passed in a string with leading whitespace, thus strtrim() 
created an unaligned string, which caused the strscpy() to access past the end of 
the kmalloc() buffer.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ