linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for mic detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:16:54 +0900
From:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for
 mic detection

Hi Charles,

On 2015년 10월 12일 17:45, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:26:42PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
>>>> Add additional bindings to allow configuration of the system specific
>>>> microphone detection settings.
>>>
>>> This all seems pretty much fine to me - the things it is controlling are
>>> fairly specific to the way the former Wolfson devices do, they only
>>> really make sense with a fairly particular algorithm which isn't widely
>>> implemented.
>>
>> Is that an Ack?
> 
> I am guessing Mark is slightly hesitant to ack as he probably
> doesn't want to add reviewing all our jack detection bindings to
> his already fairly sizable work load and doing so here likely
> means it will be expected in the future. From talking to people at
> LinuxCon it looks like it is pretty unlikely the DT maintainers
> will be acking individual bindings as well, basically they are
> only really looking at major/framework things and leaving the
> rest to subsystem maintainers.
> 
> Given that these patches only touch MFD/Extcon and extcon
> is a subsystem designed to handle things like jack detection
> isn't it really sufficient that you and Chanwoo have looked this
> and are happy with it? Otherwise I really don't see anyway to
> move this forward and would appreciate any suggestions?

I'm positive about your patches. After receiving the ack from MFD maintainer
I want to apply this patch-set on extcon git repository.

Also, I reviewed this patch on previous patch[1].
[1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/11/81

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/