linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:08:58 +0530
From:	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
To:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:	kbuild-all@...org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, JBottomley@...n.com,
	vinholikatti@...il.com, amit.daniel@...sung.com, essuuj@...il.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be
 static

HI
How I am support to handle this patch? Should I just fix these warnings 
in my patch or I just add this as a separate patch on the top of the series?


On 10/01/2015 04:34 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> ---
>   phy-exynos-ufs.c |    6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
> index 343fcaf..835ee78 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static bool match_cfg_to_pwr_mode(u8 desc, u8 required_pwr)
>   	return false;
>   }
>
> -int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag, u8 pwr)
> +static int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag, u8 pwr)
>   {
>   	struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
>   	struct exynos_ufs_phy_cfg **cfgs = ufs_phy->cfg;
> @@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ out:
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> -void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt)
> +static void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt)
>   {
>   	struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
>
>   	ufs_phy->lane_cnt = lane_cnt;
>   }
>
> -int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy)
> +static int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy)
>   {
>   	struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
>   	const unsigned int timeout_us = 100000;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/