linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acpi: set return value to const char for some functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:59:46 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Cc:	LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Box, David E" <david.e.box@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: set return value to const char for some functions

On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 19:32 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> if you started to use "const" for some methods you usually forced to
> use this in most of your code. But the time spent for maintaining
> (typing, recompiling when some const is missing, etc.) of
> const-correctness in code seems greater than for fixing of possible
> (very rare) problems caused by not using of const-correctness at all

c is not c++.

"seems" is a dubious statement.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/